incubator-couchdb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Noah Slater <nsla...@tumbolia.org>
Subject Re: couchdb osx binary branding
Date Mon, 10 Sep 2012 17:06:03 GMT
My fault for being so behind on my mails. I will catch up with this later
and propose some changes.

On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 5:44 PM, Jan Lehnardt <jan@apache.org> wrote:

>
> On Sep 9, 2012, at 15:22 , Noah Slater <nslater@tumbolia.org> wrote:
>
> > Hmm.
> >
> > When was this added.
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> r1351084 | jan | 2012-06-17 12:00:26 +0200 (Sun, 17 Jun 2012) | 1 line
>
> add Mac OS X binary
>
>
> > I am really not happy about us linking to a Github
> > download from our homepage. This is very bad practice, IMO. (Though I am
> > very happy that we are making progress on the OS X front.)
> >
> > What will it take to get this download being built from the source by a
> > member of the release team, and hosted on ASF hardware?
>
> All these issues were brought up in the original thread and we agreed that
> we'd tackle them after we post what we have because we agreed that getting
> something out was better than nothing.
>
> Sorry if this caught you by surprise, Noah!
>
> Cheers
> Jan
> --
>
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 9:06 AM, Benoit Chesneau <bchesneau@gmail.com
> >wrote:
> >
> >> hi,
> >>
> >> I have some problems with the current binary linked on the homepage.
> >> Not with the binary by itself which works but with the branding.
> >>
> >> 1. Titte in about is "CouchDB Server" I don't know what it's means. If
> >> linked on the homepage, it should be "Apache CouchDB" imo and nothing
> >> else. Other than that we should just link it on the wiki.
> >> 2. Copyright. imo we should only have the apache copyright for
> >> anything "official". How these copyrights will work if we include the
> >> osx build in the sources btw ?
> >> 3. Since the source code isn't in the apache couchdb repository, a
> >> link to the OSX sources should be provided in the ABOUT. It's not
> >> required by the aoache 2 license, but generally we expect to find the
> >> sources in the repository when  it comes from an apache project?
> >>
> >> Anyway both can be fixed when the sources will be included in the repo
> >> (Is the process started) ?
> >>
> >> Awaiting that I would like to see something that tag the binary as non
> >> official or supported on the homepage.
> >>
> >> - benoit
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > NS
>
>


-- 
NS

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message