Mailing-List: contact dev-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of djc.ochtman@gmail.com
 designates 74.125.82.180 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: djc.ochtman@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: 
 <CAHdjipJXdtoavhB--QG0XV8tTkmiC37XmSjMdiK0-38V2+RDew@mail.gmail.com>
References: 
 <CAKmKYaAa5eTLGdYZ533FytZAnUAKqDe3CdAiGZeoOxk-frLW3A@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHdjipJXdtoavhB--QG0XV8tTkmiC37XmSjMdiK0-38V2+RDew@mail.gmail.com>
From: Dirkjan Ochtman <dirkjan@ochtman.nl>
Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2012 19:53:25 +0200
Message-ID: 
 <CAKmKYaAHM=mRSs-PzQ=yV61ECNuM61VknbXNDXAcHMrGCpH-4Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Sphinx docs
To: dev@couchdb.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 7:35 PM, Alexander Shorin <kxepal@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm ready to sent bucket of patches, but is your repo[1] be central
> point to work on CouchDB sphinx docs?  Or it will be dch[2] one? In
> other words, whom sent patches to prevent making same work twice? If
> everyone will develop his own docs version there wouldn't be anything
> good just only merge hell(:
>
> [1] https://github.com/djco/couchdb/tree/docs
> [2] https://github.com/dch/couchdb/tree/docs

At this point my repo is a straight descendant from dch's latest cset
on the docs branch, so you can probably work from my branch on. (I
used your conversion of the metadocs, BTW, thanks for that! I've
credited you in the commit message.)

Cheers,

Dirkjan