incubator-couchdb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Hans J Schroeder ...@cloudno.de>
Subject Re: So, how do we get the Mac binary on the home page?
Date Fri, 08 Jun 2012 14:31:30 GMT
Hi Jan,

> Can you specify what systems should use which versions, so we can label them correctly
on the website?

For Mac OS X 10.6.8 to 10.7.2:
https://github.com/downloads/cloudnode/couchdbx-app/CouchDB%20Server-1.2.0.zip

For Mac OS X 10.7.3 and later
https://github.com/downloads/cloudnode/couchdbx-app/CouchDB%20Server-1.2.0-OS%20X%2010.7.3.zip

@Benoit
I prefer to use only the well known port 5984.

I agree on using the sandboxing mode. I suggest to make the next version (when CouchDB 1.3
comes out) that way.

I also agree on having the code in the CouchDB repo. Maybe someone with commit rights can
do the checkin. The
License is already Apache. 

- Hans

On Jun 8, 2012, at 12:51 PM, Benoit Chesneau wrote:

> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 12:09 PM, Jan Lehnardt <jan@apache.org> wrote:
>> 
>> On Jun 8, 2012, at 10:43 , Benoit Chesneau wrote:
>> 
>>> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 12:37 AM, Hans J Schroeder <hs@cloudno.de> wrote:
>>>> Hi Ryan,
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks for testing. For older OS X versions you should use the other build.
It is the same, but built with XCode 4.2. Apple made some significant changes from 10.7.2
to 10.7.3.
>>>> 
>>>> - Hans
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> So I tested the binary and noticed it was starting on the 5984 port.
>>> 
>>> Which means it hanged there since I had already a version running. I
>>> think it would be good that a free port should be used on startup
>>> (what is done by rcouchx).  Except that it looks too work on latest
>>> osx Lion. I still need to test on the coming version and in
>>> particularly test if it works when sandboxed mode is enforced which
>>> the default in new version.
>>> 
>>> Also I would feel better to have the code in the Couchdb repository.
>>> Binaries linked on the download pages will be considered as official
>>> and supported. And imo we should only consider something as official
>>> and supported if it's in the official source under the same license
>>> agreement. Like it is for the windows one.
>> 
>> Benoit, all great points, we should definitely look into all those
>> things. I also think these are not blocking for getting the current
>> binaries on the website (given we can define which works on which
>> systems, as per my last mail, and given we don't find more issues).
>> 
>> Once we have more people using this, we can fix all the remaining
>> issues. I hope you agree! :)
>> 
>> Cheers
>> Jan
>> --
>> 
> Jan,
> 
> Yeah sure no problem at all, and technical details can be solved on time.
> 
> Although we may need  to make sure everyone is ready  and OK to put
> the code in official sources and sign everything needed ? If you think
> this is not a problem, then go :)
> 
> - benoit


Mime
View raw message