Mailing-List: contact dev-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of dave@muse.net.nz designates
 209.85.220.180 as permitted sender)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of dave@muse.net.nz designates
 10.52.77.101 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.52.77.101;
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <EB9771B5-73C0-4A1B-8763-D3FC289BA958@facilityone.com>
References: 
 <CAHZBNKapU5-AjA--EoG0uGYeoYbnWYp_wvL_M4qWoDmAhc7tNg@mail.gmail.com>
	<7C225DF2-C134-4035-A0A5-347B17A50DDF@facilityone.com>
	<CAHZBNKat25j1vauRXz+he=9cL2OXr49zLbbC+7PJ=dn+fWXJvA@mail.gmail.com>
	<EB9771B5-73C0-4A1B-8763-D3FC289BA958@facilityone.com>
Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2012 00:40:56 +0100
Message-ID: 
 <CAHZBNKZsj_Qqoun93FopwhgFLYNGiJ8tfe2mfGWXjGs=mL1PSQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.2.0 -- Windows Binaries
From: Dave Cottlehuber <dave@muse.net.nz>
To: dev@couchdb.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hey folks,

We're aborting in line with the 1.2.0 source release, so I've moved
the binaries https://people.apache.org/~dch/dist/1.2.0/rc2/

Thanks very much for your testing -- this week has been chaotic with
our move to Vienna so I hope to get some proper couch time again next
week.

Dirkjan, Alex - any progress to share?

A+
Dave

On 26 February 2012 18:46, Andrew Hamilton <ahamilton@facilityone.com> wrot=
e:
>
> On Feb 25, 2012, at 2:45 PM, Dave Cottlehuber wrote:
>
>> On 24 February 2012 21:18, Andrew Hamilton <ahamilton@facilityone.com> w=
rote:
>>> Not sure if this the best way to show my error log, but I am attaching =
the test suite results from couch.
>>
>> Great - ideal in fact I'd not thought of this myself :-0.
>>
>>> -1
>>> Windows 7 x64
>>> Firefox 11.0
>>> signature OK
>>> md5 & sha OK
>>> No malware
>>> End-user verification OK
>>> Futon tests failed:
>>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0attachments
>>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0attachment_paths
>>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0config
>>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0cookie_auth
>>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0delayed_commits
>>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0design_docs
>>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0erlang views
>>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0invalid_docids
>>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0replicator_db
>>> =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0view_errors
>>
>> Looks like a combo of whitelisting not cleaning up & the same issues
>> already reported prior.
>>
>> Do you want to try same steps as Jeroen (clean up var/lib/couchdb/*
>> and any changes in local.ini, restart and run tests over LAN instead
>> of localhost with local.ini bind_address updated appropriately?
>>
>> This introduces a smidgen of latency which seems to help things.
>
> I ran the test suite again, this time from my home over a VPN to my work =
computer. =A0I got all tests to pass except for stats, which failed with th=
is message:
>
> Assertion 'triggered, "We managed to force a all_dbs_active error."' fail=
ed: We managed to force a all_dbs_active error.
>
> Out of curiosity, I ran this test on localhost, and it passes just fine. =
=A0Oh, and I forgot to mention earlier I am running the R15B version.
>
>>
>> I am wondering if the issues disappear if POST _restart has a small
>> delay introduced, I'll see if there's a nice way to do this.
>>
>> BTW how fast is this box you are running it on? I'm doing everything
>> on i7 8 core or EC2 large instances. Perhaps this crops up more often
>> on low-end VMs?
>
> My machine is running a Xeon E31220 @ 3.1 GHz and 8GB of RAM. =A0It does =
seem a lot faster than even some of the servers I have previously tested on=
.
>
> I'm changing my vote to +1
>
>>
>> A+
>> Dave
>