Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E0CC99B10 for ; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 20:34:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 7948 invoked by uid 500); 15 Mar 2012 20:34:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 7796 invoked by uid 500); 15 Mar 2012 20:34:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 7787 invoked by uid 99); 15 Mar 2012 20:34:55 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 20:34:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [80.244.253.218] (HELO mail.traeumt.net) (80.244.253.218) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 20:34:47 +0000 Received: from [192.168.2.188] (unknown [62.220.4.189]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.traeumt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 241261418F for ; Thu, 15 Mar 2012 21:35:11 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257) Subject: Re: 1.2.0 status update From: Jan Lehnardt In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 21:34:26 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <0BB4F003-4C8B-441A-9CEF-08782AF170BB@dionne-associates.com> <-4709298919342606669@unknownmsgid> <4F60C606.5060409@83864.com> To: dev@couchdb.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1257) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Mar 15, 2012, at 21:10 , Dave Cottlehuber wrote: > On 15 March 2012 20:22, Noah Slater wrote: >> Again, anyone wanna help out here? >>=20 >> Most of us only have on specific environment we can test on, but the = more >> the merrier I expect. >>=20 >> Beno=EEt, could you throw a list of checkpoints for people to run = through and >> report back with? >=20 > [snip] we're onto it. >=20 > Folks - let's park the non-1.2.0 non-tech discussion for after the > eagle has landed? >=20 > Nobody on this list is lacking in Couch commitment, and a number of = people > have done an impressive job of juggling other things to help this get > across the line. >=20 > I'd rather have a couple of uncomfortable nights tag-teaming on this > and get it sorted - > we are close!! Word! Thanks everybody for pitching in :) Cheers Jan --=20