Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CE0559E43 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 14:57:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 74871 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2012 14:57:31 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 74833 invoked by uid 500); 11 Mar 2012 14:57:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 74825 invoked by uid 99); 11 Mar 2012 14:57:31 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 14:57:31 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of koeglstefan@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.170 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.170] (HELO mail-wi0-f170.google.com) (209.85.212.170) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 14:57:22 +0000 Received: by wibhr17 with SMTP id hr17so2244369wib.5 for ; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 07:57:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=kJjyW4KesGE3uJJ8AW8o3oE4KsVQw+M0VCrV8jYaqoU=; b=zVVwa4lvS1+vkw7pbbzsIRojBLFuMrAn5ce6AvvHhm+Ulq5mj47yPGpM3w+BJTa4xT R9vKF3aruAbRXnYaV8ouPyWcuUOGtttQ0jV9QrrKb2emOjXQIcqDX49MJTVMuc9WvNsc 36/6Av7/8Qm9q4nNBgsKYRK7j/4+8f+AY0cwRsJdrDmuz3OaVx+KYKpGAE6U15SH8U/y r7vi6RySHfljuEmi2N8bDf/6wI9sdT9iy1G+jKSwEUnztHJD9yrjh9MfG7fgnHVXr15K LFlBHXsODKaAwTwW/VVngqyreIcTcN7e4Kb7aGcpxhZsiFPeh2Mjcas3AWWoKDowNg6K Zs2w== Received: by 10.180.88.199 with SMTP id bi7mr19991854wib.12.1331477821871; Sun, 11 Mar 2012 07:57:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.132] (vie-91-186-150-053.dsl.sil.at. [91.186.150.53]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k6sm24905005wiy.7.2012.03.11.07.56.59 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 11 Mar 2012 07:57:00 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4F5CBD3A.3050001@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 15:56:58 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?U3RlZmFuIEvDtmds?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120309 Thunderbird/11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Subject: Re: Crash of CouchDB 1.2.x References: <5D5AF65F-88FE-4A19-8D92-800E956235B6@apache.org> <26E0BD0D-0047-44B1-925C-BBA68A3448A3@apache.org> <4F4FC68D.7080206@gmail.com> <697FCEB2-0071-4F08-A463-A073DBA0B315@apache.org> <4F5C9FAD.2040300@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 03/11/2012 02:32 PM, Jason Smith wrote: > Longshot, but is it possible that couch had a file handle to an > unlinked file, so once the (OS) process crashed, the space was > freed? Hmm.. that might be possible. I ran a database compaction before that. When I noticed the crash I saw that the db compaction finished, but it might be possible that it still had a handle to the old db file. How should we proceed from here? Is it possible for me to provide further information about that in retrospect? -- Stefan