Mailing-List: contact dev-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy)
Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of wendallc@83864.com designates
 10.68.217.136 as permitted sender) client-ip=10.68.217.136;
Message-ID: <4F4FBD5B.2030804@83864.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2012 10:18:03 -0800
From: Wendall Cada <wendallc@83864.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686;
 rv:10.0.1) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: dev@couchdb.apache.org
Subject: Re: Please report your indexing speed
References: 
 <CAN-3CBKk7rykwrwdWwizwPGOUk41xP-uYFG-i49=nZsOMZe-VQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <4F4E7F11.4010104@83864.com>
 <CABvT1DHUBYRXc+VCCVHkF9HPTh6KAjhDUGqbxmP8M68EGs39Kw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CABvT1DHUBYRXc+VCCVHkF9HPTh6KAjhDUGqbxmP8M68EGs39Kw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Here are my 1.1.1 results on the same hardware/kernel/spidermonkey:

{"couchdb":"Welcome","version":"1.1.1"}
real    0m32.029s
user    0m0.000s
sys     0m0.006s

Wendall

On 02/29/2012 01:30 PM, Robert Newson wrote:
> Benoit, could you run the 1.7.0 test for longer? Say, double the size
> of BULK_COUNT?
>
> Wendall, that's a useful new data point. Any chance you could compare
> 1.1.1 with 1.2 so we can line it up with the other results?
>
> B.
>
> On 29 February 2012 19:40, Wendall Cada<wendallc@83864.com>  wrote:
>> I'm using the bash script provided by Robert Newson.
>>
>> Linux version 3.2.7-1.fc16.i686.PAE
>> (mockbuild@x86-16.phx2.fedoraproject.org) (gcc version 4.6.2 20111027 (Red
>> Hat 4.6.2-1) (GCC) )
>> spidermonkey 1.8.5
>> i686
>>
>> {"couchdb":"Welcome","version":"1.0.3"} (from stock fedora rpm Release:
>> 2.fc16)
>> real    0m35.652s
>> user    0m0.001s
>> sys     0m0.006s
>>
>> {"couchdb":"Welcome","version":"1.2.0"} git 4cd60f3d1683
>> real    0m20.134s
>> user    0m0.002s
>> sys     0m0.004s
>>
>> Wendall
>>
>>
>> On 02/28/2012 05:17 AM, Jason Smith wrote:
>>> Forgive the clean new thread. Hopefully it will not remain so.
>>>
>>> If you can, would you please clone https://github.com/jhs/slow_couchdb
>>>
>>> And build whatever Erlangs and CouchDB checkouts you see fit, and run
>>> the test. For example:
>>>
>>>      docs=500000 ./bench.sh small_doc.tpl
>>>
>>> That should run the test and, God willing, upload the results to a
>>> couch in the cloud. We should be able to use that information to
>>> identify who you are, whether you are on SSD, what Erlang and Couch
>>> build, and how fast it ran. Modulo bugs.
>>