incubator-couchdb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Noah Slater <nsla...@tumbolia.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.2.0 release, second round
Date Sat, 03 Mar 2012 14:50:32 GMT
Thanks!

On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 1:04 PM, Jan Lehnardt <jan@apache.org> wrote:

>
> On Mar 3, 2012, at 00:31 , Jan Lehnardt wrote:
>
> > Good catch, will do in the morning.
>
> Done.
>
> >
> > Cheers
> > Jan
> > --
> >
> > On 02.03.2012, at 20:00, Noah Slater <nslater@tumbolia.org> wrote:
> >
> >> Have you updated NEWS and CHANGES?
> >>
> >> On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 5:47 PM, Jan Lehnardt <jan@apache.org> wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>> On Mar 2, 2012, at 17:28 , Noah Slater wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Vote aborted. Thanks to everyone who took part.
> >>>>
> >>>> Five people have claimed ownership of the five remaining tasks:
> >>>>
> >>>> * Bob Dionne will driving COUCHDB-1424
> >>>> * Benoît Chesneau will be driving COUCHDB-1426
> >>>> * Jan Lehnardt will be driving the R15B patch
> >>>
> >>> √
> >>>
> >>>
> http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=couchdb.git;a=commit;h=776aa1d0
> >>>
> >>> Landed in both 1.2.x and master. Thanks to Paul Davis for coming up
> with
> >>> the more canonical C version.
> >>>
> >>> Cheers
> >>> Jan
> >>> --
> >>>
> >>>> * Robert Newson will be driving the performance work
> >>>> * I will be driving round three, obviously
> >>>>
> >>>> Let's kick some ass!
> >>>>
> >>>> On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 4:05 PM, Robert Newson <rnewson@apache.org>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> +1. Abort this, get the fixes we have in and start round 3. The
> >>>>> performance regression issue is elusive, we might, out of necessity,
> >>>>> have to defer action on that until post 1.2.0.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 2 March 2012 16:02, Noah Slater <nslater@tumbolia.org>
wrote:
> >>>>>> I think we should, at a minimum:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> * Abort this round
> >>>>>> * Land the R15B patch
> >>>>>> * Land COUCHDB-1426 (which seems easy)
> >>>>>> * Start round three
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I think we should try to:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> * Try to land COUCHDB-1424
> >>>>>> * Get clarification on the performance issues
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> For these last two items, I think we should impose a time limit.
> Let's
> >>>>> say
> >>>>>> a week.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I think we should also form some teams, to see if we can do
some
> >>> sprints
> >>>>> to
> >>>>>> get these issues fixed.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Jan Lehnardt <jan@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Mar 2, 2012, at 16:47 , Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 16:29, Jan Lehnardt <jan@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> Proposed Action:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> I'd propose to release 1.2.0 as-is with the following
points
> >>>>> mentioned
> >>>>>>>>> in the release notes (the exact wording of which
is to be done):
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> 1. Note that this release is incompatible with Erlang
R15B. A
> patch
> >>>>> is
> >>>>>>>>> available at [LINK to DIFF]; it will appear in Apache
CouchDB
> 1.2.1.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> 2. Also note that there are some reports of a performance
> regression
> >>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>> view building. While initial and ad-hoc tests showed
an
> improvement
> >>>>> in
> >>>>>>>>> most cases, we'd like to ask our users to report
any significant
> >>>>>>>>> differences to the Apache CouchDB 1.1.1 release.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> While I am usually cheering on the release process,
taken
> together it
> >>>>>>>> seems more prudent to abort this round, take the R15B
driver and
> the
> >>>>>>>> 142{4,6} patches and then starting a new round.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I'd agree if 142{4,6} were decided tickets, but they are
still
> ongoing
> >>>>>>> and potentially, in the 24-case especially, for a while.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Cheers
> >>>>>>> Jan
> >>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message