incubator-couchdb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Noah Slater <nsla...@tumbolia.org>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.2.0 release, second round
Date Fri, 02 Mar 2012 19:00:02 GMT
Have you updated NEWS and CHANGES?

On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 5:47 PM, Jan Lehnardt <jan@apache.org> wrote:

>
> On Mar 2, 2012, at 17:28 , Noah Slater wrote:
>
> > Vote aborted. Thanks to everyone who took part.
> >
> > Five people have claimed ownership of the five remaining tasks:
> >
> > * Bob Dionne will driving COUCHDB-1424
> > * Benoît Chesneau will be driving COUCHDB-1426
> > * Jan Lehnardt will be driving the R15B patch
>
> √
>
> http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=couchdb.git;a=commit;h=776aa1d0
>
> Landed in both 1.2.x and master. Thanks to Paul Davis for coming up with
> the more canonical C version.
>
> Cheers
> Jan
> --
>
> > * Robert Newson will be driving the performance work
> > * I will be driving round three, obviously
> >
> > Let's kick some ass!
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 4:05 PM, Robert Newson <rnewson@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> >> +1. Abort this, get the fixes we have in and start round 3. The
> >> performance regression issue is elusive, we might, out of necessity,
> >> have to defer action on that until post 1.2.0.
> >>
> >>
> >> On 2 March 2012 16:02, Noah Slater <nslater@tumbolia.org> wrote:
> >>> I think we should, at a minimum:
> >>>
> >>> * Abort this round
> >>> * Land the R15B patch
> >>> * Land COUCHDB-1426 (which seems easy)
> >>> * Start round three
> >>>
> >>> I think we should try to:
> >>>
> >>> * Try to land COUCHDB-1424
> >>> * Get clarification on the performance issues
> >>>
> >>> For these last two items, I think we should impose a time limit. Let's
> >> say
> >>> a week.
> >>>
> >>> I think we should also form some teams, to see if we can do some
> sprints
> >> to
> >>> get these issues fixed.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Jan Lehnardt <jan@apache.org> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Mar 2, 2012, at 16:47 , Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> On Fri, Mar 2, 2012 at 16:29, Jan Lehnardt <jan@apache.org>
wrote:
> >>>>>> Proposed Action:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I'd propose to release 1.2.0 as-is with the following points
> >> mentioned
> >>>>>> in the release notes (the exact wording of which is to be done):
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> 1. Note that this release is incompatible with Erlang R15B.
A patch
> >> is
> >>>>>> available at [LINK to DIFF]; it will appear in Apache CouchDB
1.2.1.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> 2. Also note that there are some reports of a performance regression
> >> in
> >>>>>> view building. While initial and ad-hoc tests showed an improvement
> >> in
> >>>>>> most cases, we'd like to ask our users to report any significant
> >>>>>> differences to the Apache CouchDB 1.1.1 release.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> While I am usually cheering on the release process, taken together
it
> >>>>> seems more prudent to abort this round, take the R15B driver and
the
> >>>>> 142{4,6} patches and then starting a new round.
> >>>>
> >>>> I'd agree if 142{4,6} were decided tickets, but they are still ongoing
> >>>> and potentially, in the 24-case especially, for a while.
> >>>>
> >>>> Cheers
> >>>> Jan
> >>>> --
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message