Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 672FE733F for ; Thu, 6 Oct 2011 11:05:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 83893 invoked by uid 500); 6 Oct 2011 11:05:38 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 83842 invoked by uid 500); 6 Oct 2011 11:05:38 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 83834 invoked by uid 99); 6 Oct 2011 11:05:38 -0000 Received: from minotaur.apache.org (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Oct 2011 11:05:38 +0000 Received: from localhost (HELO mail-iy0-f180.google.com) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username rnewson, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Oct 2011 11:05:38 +0000 Received: by iahk25 with SMTP id k25so4391959iah.11 for ; Thu, 06 Oct 2011 04:05:38 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.25.206 with SMTP id a14mr1088433ibc.15.1317899137962; Thu, 06 Oct 2011 04:05:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.65.79 with HTTP; Thu, 6 Oct 2011 04:05:37 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2011 12:05:37 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: CouchDB 1.1.1 From: Robert Newson To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Thanks all, I've pushed the change to 1.1.x. make check and futon all pass; review would still be nice. :) I simply reverted the two commits. B. On 6 October 2011 12:02, Jan Lehnardt wrote: > > On Oct 6, 2011, at 10:30 , Robert Newson wrote: > >> There is no build of 1.1.1 on Ubuntu 11.x that will work as well as >> 1.1.0, so I think it's correct that it cannot build under those >> conditions. >> >> Let's get 1.1.1 out, with the many useful bug fixes and tweaks, and >> then focus on getting 1.2 out with 1.8.5 support (and "BREAKING >> CHANGES"). >> >> I vote +1 to removing 1.8.5 support and the paren hack from 1.1.x. > > +1 > > Cheers > Jan > -- > > >> >> B. >> >> On 6 October 2011 09:25, Paul Davis wrote: >>> On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 3:23 AM, Robert Newson wrote: >>>> All, >>>> >>>> Paul Davis has researched the issue and it seems intractable. >>>> >>>> I would like to remove 1.8.5 support from 1.1.1. It was not present in >>>> 1.1.0 so will not be (officially) missed. >>>> >>>> The place for a breaking change of this magnitude is 1.2, not a minor >>>> bug fix release. >>>> >>>> Thoughts? >>>> B. >>>> >>> >>> +1 on removing the paren hack for sure. >>> >>> Not sure about removing 1.8.5 support completely. On the one hand, it >>> would prevent breakage because people couldn't link against the >>> breaking SM. On the other hand, it prevents people from linking >>> against 1.8.5 which means it won't build on Ubuntu 11.x. >>> >>> Unless someone comes up with a magic option I'd say put it to an >>> informal vote so that I can blame someone else. >>> >>>> On 5 October 2011 18:25, Paul Davis wrote: >>>>> Yes, its release blocking. >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 7:56 AM, Robert Newson wrote: >>>>>> All, >>>>>> >>>>>> I went through JIRA and updated CHANGES and NEWS on origin/1.1.x to >>>>>> include everything that was missing (Sidenote: Can we all keep this >>>>>> file up to date when commit bugfixes or add features?). I'd appreciate >>>>>> everyone giving it a look over before I start to build the release >>>>>> artifact. >>>>>> >>>>>> I believe there's an outstanding issue (not present in JIRA) around >>>>>> javascript function evaluation? Can someone confirm that it's release >>>>>> blocking? >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> B. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> > >