incubator-couchdb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jan Lehnardt <...@apache.org>
Subject Re: CouchDB 1.1.1
Date Thu, 06 Oct 2011 11:02:43 GMT

On Oct 6, 2011, at 10:30 , Robert Newson wrote:

> There is no build of 1.1.1 on Ubuntu 11.x that will work as well as
> 1.1.0, so I think it's correct that it cannot build under those
> conditions.
> 
> Let's get 1.1.1 out, with the many useful bug fixes and tweaks, and
> then focus on getting 1.2 out with 1.8.5 support (and "BREAKING
> CHANGES").
> 
> I vote +1 to removing 1.8.5 support and the paren hack from 1.1.x.

+1

Cheers
Jan
-- 


> 
> B.
> 
> On 6 October 2011 09:25, Paul Davis <paul.joseph.davis@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 6, 2011 at 3:23 AM, Robert Newson <rnewson@apache.org> wrote:
>>> All,
>>> 
>>> Paul Davis has researched the issue and it seems intractable.
>>> 
>>> I would like to remove 1.8.5 support from 1.1.1. It was not present in
>>> 1.1.0 so will not be (officially) missed.
>>> 
>>> The place for a breaking change of this magnitude is 1.2, not a minor
>>> bug fix release.
>>> 
>>> Thoughts?
>>> B.
>>> 
>> 
>> +1 on removing the paren hack for sure.
>> 
>> Not sure about removing 1.8.5 support completely. On the one hand, it
>> would prevent breakage because people couldn't link against the
>> breaking SM. On the other hand, it prevents people from linking
>> against 1.8.5 which means it won't build on Ubuntu 11.x.
>> 
>> Unless someone comes up with a magic option I'd say put it to an
>> informal vote so that I can blame someone else.
>> 
>>> On 5 October 2011 18:25, Paul Davis <paul.joseph.davis@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Yes, its release blocking.
>>>> 
>>>> On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 7:56 AM, Robert Newson <rnewson@apache.org>
wrote:
>>>>> All,
>>>>> 
>>>>> I went through JIRA and updated CHANGES and NEWS on origin/1.1.x to
>>>>> include everything that was missing (Sidenote: Can we all keep this
>>>>> file up to date when commit bugfixes or add features?). I'd appreciate
>>>>> everyone giving it a look over before I start to build the release
>>>>> artifact.
>>>>> 
>>>>> I believe there's an outstanding issue (not present in JIRA) around
>>>>> javascript function evaluation? Can someone confirm that it's release
>>>>> blocking?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> B.
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 


Mime
View raw message