incubator-couchdb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jan Lehnardt (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (COUCHDB-1183) Shouldn't coffee-script.js be available in non-compressed form ?
Date Thu, 02 Jun 2011 09:59:51 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1183?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13042672#comment-13042672
] 

Jan Lehnardt commented on COUCHDB-1183:
---------------------------------------

On second thought, I'm only happy to maintain a local copy if we do that for all dependencies
and I don't know if that makes much sense. All we depend on are relatively stable and established
projects, so I don't see an immediate value of having a copy.

> Shouldn't coffee-script.js be available in non-compressed form ?
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: COUCHDB-1183
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-1183
>             Project: CouchDB
>          Issue Type: Question
>            Reporter: Benoit Chesneau
>             Fix For: 1.2
>
>
> actually coffee-script.js is provided in its compressed form in share/server. While the
compression may be needed this is the only file provided like this. Also I think it's better
to provide all sources from which CouchDB depends (and it may be an Apache concern too) so
we don't rely on any third party to get full sources. 
> What I propose is to make it available uncompressed, and at build compress it. While
we are here we could probably do that for other too. Other solution may be to provide both
format (compressed and uncompressed) in the archive and sources. Thoughts?

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Mime
View raw message