Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 35844 invoked from network); 8 Oct 2010 12:18:37 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 8 Oct 2010 12:18:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 53733 invoked by uid 500); 8 Oct 2010 12:18:37 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 53632 invoked by uid 500); 8 Oct 2010 12:18:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 53619 invoked by uid 99); 8 Oct 2010 12:18:35 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Oct 2010 12:18:35 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of bchesneau@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.52 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.52] (HELO mail-pz0-f52.google.com) (209.85.210.52) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Oct 2010 12:18:27 +0000 Received: by pzk3 with SMTP id 3so219687pzk.11 for ; Fri, 08 Oct 2010 05:18:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=D2CNgsTtL/BGCM44KFvSOsw0TRX8+MfFEOtnTF3Gmn0=; b=xPv8Th/x5fgwRVT9OcmOok8mpj7U63RC0kb/ZExFuglmbUwIkHJBuKBRpXKHP6Lrty NSW4wtGLhZGsXnPLRlqVlqzcWugklvTYxm2Id3dROx5OzNrRicfU3EKWUNl16tMaqeEX DQzHnFBp2Net5tpsE5vD207xPu0jOPyLp1AMI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=wg+QcwNyemJIiqNFqme+grXqXtNMoZllNRCKhu6s9MWSxP0EWnlPhTuPKSu6uLYws1 RE/ZqPnJUXDhYhkDCkneW6mW4FcENw2iFcHvMY8yqyXowwaOApz+q8HBtaPZecoggXKP UuJn32xk66xCdVXHLVSj31QGCNy39sSegUCj4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.215.3 with SMTP id n3mr1890129wfg.30.1286540286163; Fri, 08 Oct 2010 05:18:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.169.148 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Oct 2010 05:18:05 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20101007162644.EF41023889DA@eris.apache.org> Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 14:18:05 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: svn commit: r1005513 - /couchdb/trunk/share/www/script/test/bulk_docs.js From: Benoit Chesneau To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 2:15 PM, Benoit Chesneau wrote: > On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 1:33 PM, Filipe David Manana wrote: >>> >>> In my opinion, you don't need the === in this case imo == is enough >>> since we compare 2 values, doesn't it ? >> >> Do you see any issue with it? >> Afaik, the use of === and !== are standard best practices (recommended >> by Crockford). >> But yes, for this case, use of == and === is the same. >> > > No issue with it. Just a *minor* detail I wanted to tell you. > /tell/discuss with