Mailing-List: contact dev-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of bchesneau@gmail.com designates
 209.85.214.180 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        b=krR/Vll/f2wD/hB1MmD8XycoY7aI4OPBF6vmj4v/vGdfRjOb5IMeEUB8fR1o5EZjKf
         3GvFcpnERu3dJ4MBu+F1liM6R+yvi5DHd+Mnzvvzl2ZFN1V5aOYb3JRet9Gnjf7WawmF
         vTybH7pOK7cFnmSlPl4V/BGzAW2otMx5cIpek=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTiki0XuZhR0qHLEe2Xw31Vbogcp2YgpaRN2eg4nq@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20101007162644.EF41023889DA@eris.apache.org>
	<AANLkTinNJ2f9G2x1uVHKnZujsNT-RgXzzhrCQaX7UOzb@mail.gmail.com>
	<AANLkTiki0XuZhR0qHLEe2Xw31Vbogcp2YgpaRN2eg4nq@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2010 14:15:16 +0200
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=65=oV+U1HVDv3FbTEcgVeC9Gx1MseTdEb0qcG@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: svn commit: r1005513 -
 /couchdb/trunk/share/www/script/test/bulk_docs.js
From: Benoit Chesneau <bchesneau@gmail.com>
To: dev@couchdb.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 1:33 PM, Filipe David Manana <fdmanana@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> In my opinion, you don't need the === in this case imo == is enough
>> since we compare 2 values, doesn't it ?
>
> Do you see any issue with it?
> Afaik, the use of === and !== are standard best practices (recommended
> by Crockford).
> But yes, for this case, use of == and === is the same.
>

No issue with it. Just a *minor* detail I wanted to tell you.

I like to use the right operator, when needed.  Here "==" was enough,
so why not just using it. I understand your argument anyway, so no
issue *at all*.

- benoit