Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 10326 invoked from network); 5 Mar 2010 11:18:11 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 5 Mar 2010 11:18:11 -0000 Received: (qmail 15335 invoked by uid 500); 5 Mar 2010 11:17:56 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 14876 invoked by uid 500); 5 Mar 2010 11:17:54 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 14860 invoked by uid 99); 5 Mar 2010 11:17:54 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 05 Mar 2010 11:17:54 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of djc.ochtman@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.52 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.52] (HELO mail-ww0-f52.google.com) (74.125.82.52) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 05 Mar 2010 11:17:48 +0000 Received: by wwe15 with SMTP id 15so1839800wwe.11 for ; Fri, 05 Mar 2010 03:17:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:reply-to:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=SlUKIjTjbz6thmpDXwsSDbGgXCJZ0UDnhO0DE0qpbWE=; b=p/TKXeJGn3J2NvoEk/eONe5EGcvdapw1oCgc1SfQam3PuqsNzF0qpq1M0Nnq4yPg9o dtH4p9yxEzN3eOA9nEXUOpz++SafXwA5ZF4J2Dn8lZmJk0GTFjKasNzUSXRArkvpWIC7 aYX1VKYPS3DmxHMeB0GAa7PO9EBuV7C8kGjc0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type; b=uJW2d68Bbt7w2KMwBonG9CGA3IvHZqOIX3bT/hcdemjVBQShhDTxiFTj3kXCka2rl+ /i/d0HU14WOz5b3m1WhHbn5xEESi0fS0CPLJq51r5l2irxnOYeedYu2C/Naju8fVWcL4 bOWtOYRAFZ/S8AjNjCp1TWMe+lQyo5InrbtaE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.88.134 with SMTP id a6mr12853wef.66.1267787847163; Fri, 05 Mar 2010 03:17:27 -0800 (PST) Reply-To: dirkjan@ochtman.nl In-Reply-To: <71DE26DB-136C-43CD-B6C3-F51B00FC6C8F@googlemail.com> References: <71DE26DB-136C-43CD-B6C3-F51B00FC6C8F@googlemail.com> From: Dirkjan Ochtman Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2010 12:17:07 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Hitting the reduce overflow boundary To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Cc: user@couchdb.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 18:45, Daniel Truemper wrote: > Moving this to user@c.a.o?! Not sure where it makes most sense, since I consider this a bug that merits some discussion. > I think you view could need some improvement but it is kind of hard to guess what you are trying to do. Maybe you could provide a little more details about it!? I have transfer documents that have an arbitrary amount of currencies in which some amount got transferred. In my view, I'd like to classify documents in one of two buckets and aggregate all transfers in that buckets into a single transfer object that sums the transfer amount per currency. I would really like to have someone from the dev team speak up on this one, since I'd kind of like to re-enable the reduce_limit option, but I don't think this view should be classified as overflowing. Cheers, Dirkjan