incubator-couchdb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mark Hammond <skippy.hamm...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: POST with _id
Date Tue, 04 Aug 2009 00:36:38 GMT
On 4/08/2009 7:44 AM, Chris Anderson wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 1:48 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman<dirkjan@ochtman.nl>  wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 20:27, Jan Lehnardt<jan@apache.org>  wrote:
>>> I remember stumbling over this at least twice in the (distant) past. I
>>> prefer the forced PUT, but then I'm also the one to argue intuitive APIs.
>>> Considering no downsides (usually Damien adds or leaves out features for a
>>> reason), I don't see anything wrong with Brian's proposal.
>>
>> I also agree with Brian's proposal. I think per the spec the server
>> can still use a resource component the client proposed in a POST, it's
>> just not obliged to do so.
>>
>
> Agree. +1 on respecting _id and _rev on docs POSTed to /db/

Another +1 here too - that has bitten me before...

Cheers,

Mark

Mime
View raw message