incubator-couchdb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Vassilakis, Thanos" <thanos.vassila...@credit-suisse.com>
Subject RE: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 0.9.1 release
Date Wed, 01 Jul 2009 14:22:17 GMT
+1 

-----Original Message-----
From: Jan Lehnardt [mailto:jan@apache.org] 
Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 8:10 PM
To: dev@couchdb.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 0.9.1 release


On 30 Jun 2009, at 01:53, Chris Anderson wrote:

> On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 1:34 AM, Adam 
> Kocoloski<adam.kocoloski@gmail.com
> > wrote:
>> I don't know if it's a regression. My logic was that we don't want to

>> do a release that fails our own test suite. I think it will be less 
>> work down the line if we just fix it tonight.  Cheers,
>>
>
> Agreed. I'm sick of failing tests in 0.9 and this should be easy to 
> fix. Thanks guys.

+1

Cheers
Jan
--

>
>> Adam
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On Jun 29, 2009, at 5:29 PM, Damien Katz <damien@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Unless this is a regression, I think we shouldn't hold up 0.9.1 for 
>>> this.
>>> We can add the fix to the branch, and if we do a 0.9.2 it will be 
>>> there.
>>>
>>> -Damien
>>>
>>> On Jun 29, 2009, at 3:59 PM, Paul Davis wrote:
>>>
>>>> Like I said on the ticket, unless I'm mistaken, _restart only 
>>>> exists for testing purposes. This fix is more about fixing the test

>>>> so that people aren't alarmed which to me doesn't change actual 
>>>> behavior as most people shouldn't be hitting _restart outside of 
>>>> test suites.
>>>>
>>>> As for the mechanics of doing a vote, I'd just wait for those that 
>>>> expressed concern about the test case failing to verify that a new
>>>> 0.9.1 tarball doesn't fail and if so then move on with our lives.
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 3:50 PM, Noah Slater<nslater@apache.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 02:47:25PM -0400, Adam Kocoloski wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We don't necessarily need to hold up 0.9.1 while we discuss the 
>>>>>> behavior of /_restart, but I think it's very likely that the 
>>>>>> implementation of /_restart will change substantially in the near

>>>>>> future.  I would go so far as to recommend that people not use 
>>>>>> the /_restart feature in 0.9.1 and below.  Best,
>>>>>
>>>>> Jan, Chris, Damien, Chris, Paul, everyone else? Thoughts?
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Noah Slater, http://tumbolia.org/nslater
>>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Chris Anderson
> http://jchrisa.net
> http://couch.io
>


=============================================================================== 
 Please access the attached hyperlink for an important electronic communications disclaimer:

 http://www.credit-suisse.com/legal/en/disclaimer_email_ib.html 
 =============================================================================== 
 

Mime
View raw message