Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 96211 invoked from network); 5 May 2009 15:03:17 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 5 May 2009 15:03:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 69635 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2009 15:03:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 69558 invoked by uid 500); 5 May 2009 15:03:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 69516 invoked by uid 99); 5 May 2009 15:03:01 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 May 2009 15:03:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=FS_REPLICA,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of jchris@gmail.com designates 74.125.46.31 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.46.31] (HELO yw-out-2324.google.com) (74.125.46.31) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 May 2009 15:02:51 +0000 Received: by yw-out-2324.google.com with SMTP id 2so2398348ywt.5 for ; Tue, 05 May 2009 08:01:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ph4k15OgrWA+TugoNZd8PTdsmbVsPlxY3T47ZvHSrDQ=; b=IUDveMfQehvN52llIQIINpuLEeQPco88bmNQmIKarvaI3umHUW6E5PG1Q5LRFgqQos HdC0U1KyKZI3/9ydq5YJ7Sg8bGy/SdkkvwY1fZ2rkrnib6atxy5uY0Gy5fiWZGV0qOI+ V2JNgB8LP4aQzQF23tEXPrsC2voa7VE+7ttDM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=oVF40JnGcS7yJ45N+vIpN+izPihrXX/pOB/56eCHk6GRJAiaRlMKatwTq9F/gcO5XL CuytLHydgRFgDLVcoJtkrBqdA3Vjkj87psVqSqh5gLWTM0rsUZPG5qyF213w7XheW8cO r17184a1knndqSULDT03RkeyARCw2Dgp1Zks4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: jchris@gmail.com Received: by 10.100.43.10 with SMTP id q10mr255022anq.113.1241535690687; Tue, 05 May 2009 08:01:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <3A933810-1718-472E-B818-65E251F023D6@apache.org> References: <3A933810-1718-472E-B818-65E251F023D6@apache.org> Date: Tue, 5 May 2009 08:01:30 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 88546c2172cf56d6 Message-ID: Subject: Re: status of multipart requests / attachment replication From: Chris Anderson To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 6:38 AM, Adam Kocoloski wrote: > Hi devs, in COUCHDB-163 we enabled the replicator to download attachments > without Base64 encoding. =A0We'd like to do the same for push replication= / > attachment uploads. > > MIME multipart is one way to go about that. =A0Has anyone put in some wor= k on > that front? =A0are there other alternatives we should be thinking about? Standalone attachment PUT is one option, which would mirror nicely the pull/GET case. > =A0Best, > > Adam > --=20 Chris Anderson http://jchrisa.net http://couch.io