Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 38821 invoked from network); 2 Mar 2009 16:27:35 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.2) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 2 Mar 2009 16:27:35 -0000 Received: (qmail 59199 invoked by uid 500); 2 Mar 2009 16:27:34 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 59162 invoked by uid 500); 2 Mar 2009 16:27:33 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 59151 invoked by uid 99); 2 Mar 2009 16:27:33 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Mar 2009 08:27:33 -0800 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jchris@gmail.com designates 209.85.198.227 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.198.227] (HELO rv-out-0506.google.com) (209.85.198.227) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 02 Mar 2009 16:27:25 +0000 Received: by rv-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id f6so2173497rvb.35 for ; Mon, 02 Mar 2009 08:27:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=HB5L2yNWZRQ+gGJ2pbywkV7uRidENBpQa1RAL7gdP0U=; b=F0dmS001M6/rr2W4NWKE67A9DH71CxyjRfTRAfI722yT7oj4XRSWnLuBAZNkYi41z9 Nc2/W+4WXLg2N0K7PelWpIrkDetdOvVEtpsaeW4/Xav5CXWBrV6SFhQ0m1a6UuULnnef Csb5ngBYpzfD5uIb+ySUnkgfcAKMwoa1U871M= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=PAJ4Xg4uypGgNFu8MxlYXvsfwClyyjBw23pB93dc50VRIH6mSr2gd/yEdLMFFlrze0 /5oUTgsBCPl6jZXjkKBbWOdZxcuDIGMgo0WpncXpfOSS1el5n+jLqT0Jandhex0BoWy0 Tj0J+nQoXY6b/a+MzraJAWOKYUZthoPeHBqbM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: jchris@gmail.com Received: by 10.142.43.7 with SMTP id q7mr3081994wfq.161.1236011225501; Mon, 02 Mar 2009 08:27:05 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20090302162321.GP4678@tumbolia.org> References: <588B4EE0-77DD-48E8-AF35-973A623C2BAD@apache.org> <20090302162321.GP4678@tumbolia.org> Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2009 08:27:05 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 89c64549acc35759 Message-ID: Subject: Re: 0.9 release From: Chris Anderson To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 8:23 AM, Noah Slater wrote: > On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 08:18:39AM -0800, Chris Anderson wrote: >> I'd like to propose that we try to do 0.9.1 0.9.2 0.9.3 etc on a >> regular basis as well. Getting releases out more often will help make >> bug reports and everything a lot more clear, as well as making sure >> that the release machinery doesn't get cobwebs. > > I am the release machinery, and I can report that I have no cobwebs. > > I can also report that making a release takes a minimum of three days because of > the necessary vote and resolution, which is quite time consuming, so I would like > to keep releases moderately infrequent, within reason. > Sure thing. I suppose it's more the habit of releasing often that I'm thinking of. There are a lot of numbers between 0.8.1 and 0.9.0 that we didn't use. Which is probably because we were moving from Incubator etc. I know we don't have to use them all, but releasing at minimum once a month would be a user-friendly thing to do. > There are three on my pile which I'd like to fix before the release. Maybe you can squash them before the end of the week? Chris -- Chris Anderson http://jchris.mfdz.com