incubator-connectors-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Karl Wright <daddy...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Apache ManifoldCF 0.4-incubating, RC0
Date Sun, 18 Dec 2011 15:38:31 GMT
The problem is that the war files require all the dependencies in them
in order to work properly.  Since the alfresco connector requires a
GPL dependency, we cannot ship these in binary form.  And the .jar
file by itself is useless.

Karl

On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 9:48 AM, Piergiorgio Lucidi
<piergiorgio@apache.org> wrote:
> I would like to see the mcf-alfresco-connector.jar released in the
> connector-lib folder of the official release binary package in this
> way users could only add all the Alfresco dependencies provided by
> Alfresco SDK and configure the connector in the XML file.
>
> Piergiorgio
>
> 2011/12/18 Piergiorgio Lucidi <piergiorgio@apache.org>:
>> Ok, these are all the steps that I have done:
>>
>> - downloaded all the artifacts
>> - verified all the signatures (md5, sha1, gpg)
>> - verified the binary package structure
>> - verified the example application
>> - verified the source code package
>>
>> But I don't see the Alfresco Connector included in the default package.
>>
>> How we can say to users that exists the Alfresco Connector and how
>> users could add the support for this latest connector?
>> I think that we should add a documentation section dedicated to this.
>>
>> +1 for me, but I suggest to add an how-to section in the documentation
>> in the website about how to add the Alfresco Connector before the
>> final official release.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Piergiorgio
>>
>> 2011/12/17 Karl Wright <daddywri@gmail.com>:
>>> I've again uploaded an apache-manifoldcf-0.4-incubating package which you
>>> can download from http://people.apache.org/~kwright.  If you agree
>>> this should be released please vote +1.
>>>
>>> [Note that the release of this artifact is dependent on the release of
>>> the three plugin packages upon which it depends.  If we need to change
>>> those packages we'll need to spin a new RC of this one.  Also please
>>> note that I've include SHA1 signatures for the first time, as per
>>> Jukka's suggestion.]
>>>
>>> I apologize again for the earlier hiccup.  This one is the real thing,
>>> though, and passes all tests.
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>> Karl
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Piergiorgio Lucidi
>> http://about.me/piergiorgiolucidi
>
>
>
> --
> Piergiorgio Lucidi
> http://about.me/piergiorgiolucidi

Mime
View raw message