Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-cloudstack-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cloudstack-users-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3152FD9EE for ; Tue, 4 Sep 2012 18:51:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 18397 invoked by uid 500); 4 Sep 2012 18:51:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cloudstack-users-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 18377 invoked by uid 500); 4 Sep 2012 18:51:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cloudstack-users-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 18367 invoked by uid 99); 4 Sep 2012 18:51:02 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 04 Sep 2012 18:51:02 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of fguerrero@ipaddress.com.ar designates 200.80.170.227 as permitted sender) Received: from [200.80.170.227] (HELO exch1.ipaddress.com.ar) (200.80.170.227) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 04 Sep 2012 18:50:57 +0000 Received: from [192.168.2.139] ([190.247.112.43] RDNS failed) by exch1.ipaddress.com.ar over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 4 Sep 2012 15:50:34 -0300 Message-ID: <50464D75.3070104@ipaddress.com.ar> Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2012 15:50:29 -0300 From: Facundo Guerrero User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cloudstack-users@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: multiple NICs on same network References: <20120904065655.GG4575@cloud.com> In-Reply-To: <20120904065655.GG4575@cloud.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 04 Sep 2012 18:50:34.0370 (UTC) FILETIME=[2A732E20:01CD8ACE] X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: SMEX-8.0.0.1259-6.500.1024-19160.007 X-TM-AS-Result: No--10.612000-0.000000-31 X-TM-AS-User-Approved-Sender: Yes X-TM-AS-User-Blocked-Sender: No X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org It's possible to NAT 1:1 a public IP for each of this Privates IP's? To do that at this moment i modify the script in the VP. Thanks El 04/09/12 03:56, Prasanna Santhanam escribi�: > On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 12:36:59PM -0400, Alena Prokharchyk wrote: >> On 8/29/12 3:13 AM, "Sumita Gorla" wrote: >> >>> Can we use Cloudstack APIs to create a VM with two NICs on the same >>> shared network >>> Or isolated network? >>> >> >> No, one nic per user vm network. > The API can be used to create a VM with multiple nics in the same > network. The logic to prevent this in the UI only. You just have to > specify the same NetworkId as a comma-seperated list. so the following > works atm: > > deployVirtualMachine > &templateId=ttt > &serviceOfferingId=sss > &networkId=nn,nn > > > Most likely the default gateway gets clobbered and only one NIC is in > use at all times. The other being passive. > > Just Curious, What would be a use-case for such a requirement though? > > Thanks, > >