incubator-cloudstack-users-cn mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Frank Zhang <Frank.Zh...@citrix.com>
Subject RE: 超出Host的VM
Date Mon, 16 Jul 2012 17:52:16 GMT
个人觉得没有希望,而且这不是将来的方向。
单个VM超出host的资源,在非虚拟化世界里其实就类似于大型机,单个机器拥有大量资源用于运算。
但目前的趋势是通过软件方法将普通机器集群起来,例如分布式计算,来达到甚至超过大型机的。


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lu Heng [mailto:h.lu@anytimechinese.com]
> Sent: Monday, July 16, 2012 12:58 AM
> To: cloudstack-users-cn@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: 超出Host的VM
> 
> 但如果单个VM永远大不过单个HOST的话。。。大规模计算永远得靠
> 老办法(多个服务器做平衡等等)。
> 
> 未来有希望嘛。。。?
> 
> On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 6:50 AM, Edison Su <Edison.su@citrix.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Sent from my iPhone
> >
> > On Jul 14, 2012, at 2:13 PM, "Lu Heng" <h.lu@anytimechinese.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Hey colleagues:
> >>
> >> 我想问的是目前似乎不能让单个VM使用资源超出HOST服务器的资
> 源。如,如果Host server是32GB
> >> RAM的话,单个VM能同时使用多个HOST server的资源吗?
> >>
> >> 如果HOST SERVER不能实现资源整合分配的话,似乎和云的概念有些
> 不符合。
> >>
> >> 目前市面上的其他解决方案似乎都不能让单个VM使用超过HOST的
> 物理资源。
> >
> > 有个公司叫3leaf system,做的东西就跟你说的很像,把多个x86服务器
> 整合成一个服务器,但是这个公司已经破产了。。。
> >>
> >> --
> >> --
> >> Kind regards.
> >> Lu
> >>
> >> This transmission is intended solely for the addressee(s) shown above.
> >> It may contain information that is privileged, confidential or
> >> otherwise protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use
> >> of this transmission or its contents by persons other than the
> >> intended addressee(s) is strictly prohibited. If you have received
> >> this transmission in error, please notify this office immediately and
> >> e-mail the original at the sender's address above by replying to this
> >> message and including the text of the transmission received.
> 
> 
> 
> --
> --
> Kind regards.
> Lu
> 
> This transmission is intended solely for the addressee(s) shown above.
> It may contain information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise
> protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this
> transmission or its contents by persons other than the intended addressee(s)
> is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please
> notify this office immediately and e-mail the original at the sender's address
> above by replying to this message and including the text of the transmission
> received.
Mime
View raw message