incubator-cloudstack-marketing mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mathias Mullins <mathias.mull...@citrix.com>
Subject Re: website idea
Date Tue, 05 Mar 2013 21:15:07 GMT
WellÅ  that really doesn't change the conversation does it?

So let me re-phrase for the courtsÅ 

Would we want to have a listing of those companies that have chosen to
have integration with the CloudStack Project? :-)

Matt 


On 3/5/13 4:09 PM, "Joe Brockmeier" <jzb@zonker.net> wrote:

>On Tue, Mar 5, 2013, at 02:59 PM, Mathias Mullins wrote:
>> David, 
>> 
>> Then why do we have a "Integration Partners" section of the wiki?
>
>We don't. 
>
>Well, we don't now. ;-)
>
>It's now "Companies with CloudStack Integrations."
>
>https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Companies+with+Clou
>dStack+Integrations
>
>We *did* have probably because someone created the page without being
>precise about the language used.
>
>> We ask
>> people to integrate but we don't want to mention that they integrate
>>with
>> it? Seems kinda backwards doesn't it? I know a lot of good companies
>>that
>> support the Open Source version and are very proud of that fact. Maybe
>> it's just a ASF rule.
>
>It's not a matter of not mentioning it, it's a matter of being specific
>about how we acknowledge the relationships of companies/organizations
>that do things around CloudStack.
>
>Apache projects do not have corporate partners. We have no procedures or
>mechanisms to accept a "partner," nor should we. Apache projects should
>be vendor neutral, it's about community and code.
>
>That said, we can list companies that have products that support Apache
>CloudStack - but they enjoy no special status within the project. Does
>that make sense?
>
>Best,
>
>jzb
>-- 
>Joe Brockmeier
>jzb@zonker.net
>Twitter: @jzb
>http://www.dissociatedpress.net/


Mime
View raw message