incubator-cloudstack-marketing mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Noah Slater <nsla...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Draft trademark guidelines
Date Wed, 27 Feb 2013 12:21:30 GMT
I thought the mascot was called CloudMonkey? Perhaps we changed that and I
missed the thread. :)

I am not sure we *have* to assert a trademark on anything. Where does "Open
Source Cloud Computing" appear and why would we want to trademark it?


On 26 February 2013 23:21, Mathias Mullins <mathias.mullins@citrix.com>wrote:

> Just thought about it as well. "Cloudy" the name of the Character should
> be in name or place be at least ™ SM or ®.
>
> Matt
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 2/26/13 5:05 PM, "Mathias Mullins" <mathias.mullins@citrix.com> wrote:
>
> >I think you also need to add "CloudStack, Open Source Cloud Computing" as
> >one of the trademarked phrases as well. If it's in the Logo, then the
> >verbiage has to be covered too.
> >
> >Matt
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >On 2/26/13 5:00 PM, "David Nalley" <david@gnsa.us> wrote:
> >
> >>On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 4:57 PM, Chip Childers
> >><chip.childers@sungard.com> wrote:
> >>> On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 04:55:37PM -0500, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> On Feb 26, 2013, at 3:34 PM, David Nalley <david@gnsa.us> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> > Hi folks,
> >>>> >
> >>>> > Sorry for spamming two lists.
> >>>> >
> >>>> > We've been drafting some guidelines and had them reviewed by
> >>>> > trademarks@ - and wanted to get them out in public for comment
and
> >>>> > discussion.
> >>>> >
> >>>> > Draft is here:
> >>>> >
> >>>>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Trademark+Guidel
> >>>>i
> >>>>nes+(DRAFT)
> >>>> >
> >>>> >
> >>>>
> >>>> Reading it, it seems that we need to change the logos to have the
> >>>>symbol ?
> >>>
> >>> Yes, I think it does.
> >>>
> >>
> >>Yes - most definitely.
> >>
> >>>> Does this also mean that on the website and docs we need to have the
®
> >>>>symbol every time we write CloudStack® ?
> >>>
> >>> Probably, yes.  Or at least (and I'm no expert) assert the mark's
> >>> ownership in the docs somewhere.
> >>>
> >>
> >>Asserting once per doc should be fine. We have a section for this
> >>explicitly in our documentation.  (the publican brand stuff - I'll be
> >>updating that shortly)
> >
>
>


-- 
NS

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message