Mailing-List: contact cloudstack-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of runseb@gmail.com designates
 74.125.83.49 as permitted sender)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.3 \(1503\))
Subject: Re: [ACS41][DOCS]updating pots and po files
From: Sebastien Goasguen <runseb@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20130319162712.GG50896@USLT-205755.sungardas.corp>
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 12:34:56 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <EBA00A17-7469-44B1-9D88-104807253628@gmail.com>
References: <A8627FBB-D14D-49DE-AC2E-6247E5185A91@gmail.com>
 <FBC4853C6AD64943857DB9EDF30AF8E1019735@SINPEX01CL01.citrite.net>
 <CA+96GG4=fLUej7QAOz0N817acAS3-JbuRgtftg7ct9QDMn9EjA@mail.gmail.com>
 <1363709017.13651.140661206401761.43E085C2@webmail.messagingengine.com>
 <20130319161756.GF50896@USLT-205755.sungardas.corp>
 <12977ED8-90F0-4A18-A578-AF7D591CDA4F@gmail.com>
 <20130319162712.GG50896@USLT-205755.sungardas.corp>
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org


On Mar 19, 2013, at 12:27 PM, Chip Childers <chip.childers@sungard.com> =
wrote:

> On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 12:24:35PM -0400, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
>>=20
>> On Mar 19, 2013, at 12:17 PM, Chip Childers =
<chip.childers@sungard.com> wrote:
>>=20
>>> On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 11:03:37AM -0500, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Mar 19, 2013, at 08:56 AM, Chip Childers wrote:
>>>>> Radhika,
>>>>>=20
>>>>> The 22nd was the date that we were going to cut our first RC...  =
So I
>>>>> think we're going to go with what we have.
>>>>=20
>>>> Can we cut the translations on the 20th? I still need to commit =
release
>>>> notes and a few other things related to installation.=20
>>>=20
>>> Tomorrow then?
>>>=20
>>> Sebastien, what do you think?
>>=20
>> Yes I think it's fair. In the time based release mindset.
>>=20
>> I will commit the UI files later today, and test building the docs.
>>=20
>> I have not had time to check the functionality of the UI (other than =
french).
>>=20
>> -sebastien
>>=20
>>=20
>=20
> Can we ask the translators to take a look, once it's committed to 4.1?
> It would probably be best for them to do it anyway, just to make sure
> that the translations are accurate.

Yes we can ask (on the list and via social media), but I would not wait =
for an answer.

Since It's almost the first time we do this, I would suggest to post the =
docs in the translated language (PS: remember they are incomplete), and =
then we can file bugs for missing strings or wrong translations.

-sebastien

>=20
> -chip