Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-cloudstack-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cloudstack-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 804D6E5BC for ; Fri, 15 Mar 2013 21:32:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 45385 invoked by uid 500); 15 Mar 2013 21:32:27 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cloudstack-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 45277 invoked by uid 500); 15 Mar 2013 21:32:27 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cloudstack-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 45265 invoked by uid 99); 15 Mar 2013 21:32:27 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 Mar 2013 21:32:27 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of aemneina@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.42 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.42] (HELO mail-wg0-f42.google.com) (74.125.82.42) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 15 Mar 2013 21:32:21 +0000 Received: by mail-wg0-f42.google.com with SMTP id 12so955870wgh.1 for ; Fri, 15 Mar 2013 14:32:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=8QXjMH/zqqvDLNAEmaBbCt0MqnK51uJJORz6VrGuYYU=; b=ChZ8szgoibt80V8g0tJmJD+b68Fu1lrGPzfxrLFAvKfPjo+FTq/j8+/naOdNh9V28A MFJR/JHJnidTrguAItxjAbg26CuUqWgLzaFwhxasmj1Z8G6czAvRTHqUS6BtYuwMcDHx ELt7GEa7sApWT4hxu2ObcyKTHDcOFdUGY/mlc8siFHEPKUnLJGGgWReeZARF8Jtjyjoa cnBYjT+ALiSRnDBOmNcNsF++JEh2cNVIfhVn6wKvr7nLd6Gda0nq5kFGQwDrU9XGLp2Z 8oUpEfCmtcuQ5g/h6FtT/1SvEvEohUkWDSds/815+DyowLfAjA8qJyEQ/0luKW+TNrIf Gvmg== X-Received: by 10.180.87.129 with SMTP id ay1mr5592967wib.1.1363383121813; Fri, 15 Mar 2013 14:32:01 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.180.98.232 with HTTP; Fri, 15 Mar 2013 14:31:41 -0700 (PDT) Reply-To: aemneina@gmail.com In-Reply-To: References: <027a01ce21bd$7d0ca7c0$7725f740$@backbonetechnology.com> <028e01ce21c2$7be1ca10$73a55e30$@backbonetechnology.com> From: Ahmad Emneina Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 14:31:41 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VMWARE] Can 1 VSphere cluster - be managed by 2 CS hosts To: "cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d0444e889ab26a504d7fd5e3d X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --f46d0444e889ab26a504d7fd5e3d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 i doubt this would work. each cloudstack injects the system template with its keys. the keys are there for the management server to program said system vm.... are you following me? On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 2:26 PM, Musayev, Ilya wrote: > Correct, there is no deep integration like agent, however it creates > system VMs and storage pool and I'm not certain if it find them as > conflicting.. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Kelcey Damage (BT) [mailto:kelcey@backbonetechnology.com] > > Sent: Friday, March 15, 2013 5:17 PM > > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > > Subject: RE: [VMWARE] Can 1 VSphere cluster - be managed by 2 CS hosts > > > > I guess it's a trick question, because there is no agent for vmware. I > would > > say you can connect the vcenter to both management servers, it all > depends > > if any data is stored in the vcenter database. I thought CloudStack sits > atop > > vmware rather than any kind of deep integration. > > > > > > >-----Original Message----- > > >From: Musayev, Ilya [mailto:imusayev@webmd.net] > > >Sent: Friday, March 15, 2013 2:15 PM > > >To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > > >Subject: RE: [VMWARE] Can 1 VSphere cluster - be managed by 2 CS hosts > > > > > >Yes I have 1 vcenter with 3 vsphere servers dedicated for cloudstack. > > > > > >I want to use 2 CloudStack management servers (4.0 and 4.1) on the same > > >cluster. > > > > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > > >> From: Kelcey Damage (BT) [mailto:kelcey@backbonetechnology.com] > > >> Sent: Friday, March 15, 2013 4:42 PM > > >> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > > >> Subject: RE: [VMWARE] Can 1 VSphere cluster - be managed by 2 CS > > >> hosts > > >> > > >> I thought with CS we still needed vcenter, which would make the > > >> answer a no. > > >> > > >> But by CS hosts do you mean management servers? > > >> > > >> > > >> >-----Original Message----- > > >> >From: Musayev, Ilya [mailto:imusayev@webmd.net] > > >> >Sent: Friday, March 15, 2013 1:36 PM > > >> >To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > > >> >Subject: [VMWARE] Can 1 VSphere cluster - be managed by 2 CS hosts > > >> > > > >> >Would you know if I can have 1 VSphere cluster - be managed by 2 CS > > >> >hosts - this is strictly for QA tests - not prod. > > >> > > > >> >Thank you > > >> >-ilya > > >> > > > > > > > > > > --f46d0444e889ab26a504d7fd5e3d--