Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-cloudstack-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cloudstack-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2F008DD5D for ; Fri, 8 Mar 2013 20:54:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 38218 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2013 20:54:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cloudstack-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 38168 invoked by uid 500); 8 Mar 2013 20:54:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cloudstack-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 38159 invoked by uid 99); 8 Mar 2013 20:54:13 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Mar 2013 20:54:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.149.71] (HELO na3sys009aog103.obsmtp.com) (74.125.149.71) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 08 Mar 2013 20:54:07 +0000 Received: from mail-ia0-f197.google.com ([209.85.210.197]) (using TLSv1) by na3sys009aob103.postini.com ([74.125.148.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUTpP08ToGtetz5qFxfAtv5CPH0Rn9i09@postini.com; Fri, 08 Mar 2013 12:53:47 PST Received: by mail-ia0-f197.google.com with SMTP id o25so7536905iad.0 for ; Fri, 08 Mar 2013 12:53:33 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:x-received:references:from:mime-version:in-reply-to:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=t2btVGICMq35Kd0kaC471t3UXr1zfKgK4/M4V0EtCVk=; b=nl2RO0GQFtMX/jYyCgNDzQzpwq4x3s2hEPdO9XYBbRcVOjzd6RvP15szNB5tnro96Q f7AFai2HVTt0UMWxXSWGlM9OiGTuw1eYRJW2HhTEtuJ0RJ5lziwnIU5u+nA9/imcmKTL 0V056D4DtGXT8shNNk4g08PS1eqpipZIEVwhLEBZieYUYLk3f+zszMFPLHgD/rhGlx/1 kzBEtiiOn12AwAFrpC4hUXm0X/YDAAef6wjyAWRSuJwVWZxStpDMK6ruv8i+MsmFeXN8 sDZi1lQfRD4Eq8v3NluQcTfkHvRnL/pnvXBAfU4df5pvC8JKJjtypEsA7NvMi3WN/61J jxeA== X-Received: by 10.60.32.11 with SMTP id e11mr3203504oei.50.1362776013683; Fri, 08 Mar 2013 12:53:33 -0800 (PST) X-Received: by 10.60.32.11 with SMTP id e11mr3203495oei.50.1362776013456; Fri, 08 Mar 2013 12:53:33 -0800 (PST) References: <20130308162737.GC70639@USLT-205755.sungardas.corp> <20130308193027.GB94334@USLT-205755.sungardas.corp> <20130308204713.GI98093@USLT-205755.sungardas.corp> From: Chip Childers Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2013 15:53:25 -0500 Message-ID: <-5781506880521025541@unknownmsgid> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] BVT for CloudStack checkins To: "" Cc: Alex Huang Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlc4S6DyqcSHdHsq30WcpNInY7eXgkfsSXJk/yuKRpkZRvMMq294VBB3sC0c86MpgGLX0JMuQSnJg95JUMyOkGQlq+O7P+MgzsdFZRicZqrcnBHCXPDfEXntJOMRePPdzXc/6LEqhyU1Lloq4pgg1ATRhHMB4Fao5u4bDBTvMM1jkHa+iHjl89x+ti/yxmpZlCIpeAj X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Mar 8, 2013, at 3:51 PM, David Nalley wrote: > On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 3:47 PM, Chip Childers wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 02:30:27PM -0500, Chip Childers wrote: >>> Well, if we want it someone needs to do it. I'm looking at hadoop (as >>> David suggested) [snip...] >> >> Take a look at Hadoop's contributor guide [1], specifically the >> "Contributing your work" section. Hadoop is using Jira for patch >> submissions, a custom jira workflow, and builds.a.o basically does the >> CI +1 of the patch before a committer reviews and commits it. >> >> They basically have the workflow that I proposed... The downside is >> that Jira attachments are a poor way to do peer reviews. >> >> Thoughts? > > > I thought that was supposed to be the piece that Gerrit solved. > > --David > I said "workflow" not tool chain. The point was that they have a similar process, and a different use of tools to pull it off (than what we are discussing).