incubator-cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Sheng Yang <sh...@yasker.org>
Subject Re: Reverting UI for IPv6 in 4.1
Date Fri, 08 Mar 2013 19:24:42 GMT
Oh, sure, it would be documented in the manual.

Then I think API only is fine.

--Sheng

On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Ahmad Emneina <aemneina@gmail.com> wrote:
> Oh no, I'm all for API only access, of ipv6 features, for 4.1. The UI can
> come down the line... whoever wants to play with this feature will likely
> be okay with the experimental template downloaded out of band too. Is this
> going to be documented somewhere?
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Chip Childers <chip.childers@sungard.com>wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 10:00:26AM -0800, Sheng Yang wrote:
>> > On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 7:20 AM, Chip Childers <chip.childers@sungard.com>
>> wrote:
>> > > On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 03:21:38PM +0530, Radhika Puthiyetath wrote:
>> > >> Hi Sheng, Chip and other community members,
>> > >>
>> > >> What have we decided about the IPv6 support in 4.1 ?
>> > >
>> > > Looks like it isn't decided.  Do you have an opinion?
>> > >
>> > > Do others?
>> > >
>> > > Sheng - can you try to bring this to a consensus?
>> >
>> > In fact I am trying to bring this to a consensus using this thread...
>> >
>> > I think we're OK with API only.
>>
>> Ahmad is suggesting otherwise, but I'm in agreement with you.  Our next
>> feature release is probably the right time to bring it into the UI.
>>
>> Ahmad - any reasoning you can share around why you suggest having it in
>> the UI?
>>
>> >
>> > --Sheng
>> > >
>> > >>
>> > >> API only, or both UI and APIs ? I am in the process of documenting
>> this feature.
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> Thank You
>> > >> -Radhika
>> > >>
>> > >> -----Original Message-----
>> > >> From: Ahmad Emneina [mailto:aemneina@gmail.com]
>> > >> Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2013 3:43 AM
>> > >> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> > >> Subject: Re: Reverting UI for IPv6 in 4.1
>> > >>
>> > >> UI + docs on how to use the feature via api and its caveats (system
>> template X).
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Sheng Yang <sheng@yasker.org>
wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >> > On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Chip Childers
>> > >> > <chip.childers@sungard.com>
>> > >> > wrote:
>> > >> > > On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 01:50:20PM -0800, Sheng Yang wrote:
>> > >> > >> Hi,
>> > >> > >>
>> > >> > >> Since we didn't plan to include ipv6 template as default
for 4.1
>> > >> > >> release, is it necessary to revert the UI part of IPv6
to avoid
>> > >> > >> confusion in 4.1? We can support API only for 4.1
>> > >> > >>
>> > >> > >> --Sheng
>> > >> > >>
>> > >> > >
>> > >> > > So we talked about it being experimental.  Do you think we
should
>> > >> > > make experimental = API-based configuration only?  I tend
to lean
>> > >> > > that way
>> > >> > myself.
>> > >> >
>> > >> > I am OK with it, just want to hear more people's idea on it.
>> > >> >
>> > >> > If it's only API-based, it would be more difficult for potential
>> user
>> > >> > to try it. But left UI there without default system vm template
>> > >> > support would be misleading.
>> > >> >
>> > >> > --Sheng
>> > >> >
>> > >>
>> >
>>

Mime
View raw message