Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-cloudstack-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cloudstack-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F40FFD42D for ; Wed, 13 Feb 2013 20:06:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 93300 invoked by uid 500); 13 Feb 2013 20:06:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cloudstack-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 93268 invoked by uid 500); 13 Feb 2013 20:06:57 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cloudstack-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 93259 invoked by uid 99); 13 Feb 2013 20:06:57 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Feb 2013 20:06:57 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of leifer@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.51 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.215.51] (HELO mail-la0-f51.google.com) (209.85.215.51) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Feb 2013 20:06:51 +0000 Received: by mail-la0-f51.google.com with SMTP id fo13so1580123lab.38 for ; Wed, 13 Feb 2013 12:06:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ZU6b0olubgOYBTltCykLa14rDC2e0/U3kiQeAE1marM=; b=COw/TamlWmgcx80Zr/5OTXEC5uKpEqENOParzgqiMEMUP98QpWKn4fYBfbFHHThk7T BADXaV8xGeObweHV1W5+Kv4eXCxHFXoUTgWlT/DHccZe/xXgJW7jO5WtPgZODcWU1Gd0 5Xhpb/G8jBgbdyYrjWPz/9NDplRlIHSODiaPrYfwIzJGREqZk9smrXgW0ryYNbrqhNHc 6mHq5MZY32mHUE4IOhZvhUZloam2V/PRDx+IEq6SWxJSm+3ZB3V25EsyWrn4/ShqTPLm +8+Z/gsMnejjN6RWUONiuUnDbTdNuP6RfzZBVTbL1ujdqcP3eEVUXKEYSxwEez9eW6Ad 9MKQ== X-Received: by 10.152.112.36 with SMTP id in4mr21346523lab.35.1360785990683; Wed, 13 Feb 2013 12:06:30 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.152.111.101 with HTTP; Wed, 13 Feb 2013 12:06:00 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20130212045013.GF68798@USLT-205755.sungardas.corp> References: <53628857-87F4-4CC1-9FF5-3C45C0882BCC@stratosec.co> <1360598677.2729.140661189880901.7AB46155@webmail.messagingengine.com> <20130212045013.GF68798@USLT-205755.sungardas.corp> From: Leif Gruenwoldt Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2013 15:06:00 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [DISCUSS][INFRA] Setting up gerrit To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I recommend anyone for or against code review read this post by a Mozilla dev written on 18 Jan 2013. "One of the discussions happening right now in the Mozilla Foundation software team is whether mandatory code reviews are a good thing. I=92ve had versions of this conversation a number of times in the past few months, and today I=92m going to write my thoughts down so I can point at them when it comes up in the future." http://vocamus.net/dave/?p=3D1569