Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-cloudstack-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cloudstack-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5D0ECE683 for ; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 11:45:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 25635 invoked by uid 500); 3 Feb 2013 11:45:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cloudstack-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 25093 invoked by uid 500); 3 Feb 2013 11:45:12 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cloudstack-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 25024 invoked by uid 99); 3 Feb 2013 11:45:11 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 03 Feb 2013 11:45:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.214.180] (HELO mail-ob0-f180.google.com) (209.85.214.180) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 03 Feb 2013 11:44:55 +0000 Received: by mail-ob0-f180.google.com with SMTP id ef5so5391795obb.39 for ; Sun, 03 Feb 2013 03:44:33 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=986FTE3FvlynQOr52O7k5f3OJmV0A4APFhIL2urfA4o=; b=THxdc1409XBxQMdq7QHgph8v0x++P7xAIu1am0JeRxJHmr7fNCZz2KvEJ1+7W2+h7A B2eXNl1h1QBWNuEX9KConE80JXEGQndL3RK7d+gAwdZYkEIQVdL8OxUJf4FuTPdg4EhY qUcDfMsr6dBE+KYCjJWwI3Vv+nfQuNqjSGg12NB+zR/fQsN4VGb1AUG7zW9+TR6doAoT FXn8m4GFXRd1MRvsmUc77njqKXtKBqs2gsaFKhF5b7DOX0EbVBqM/fFxx9TJ62ds51q1 US5y63vgQiWJK6nPzaMdqCk+cA3SrB15JhFUvz9/lu4+x7eufjNSgEbSIRcXVrQip1RM 2e1w== X-Received: by 10.60.3.8 with SMTP id 8mr13854831oey.101.1359891872840; Sun, 03 Feb 2013 03:44:32 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.76.2.48 with HTTP; Sun, 3 Feb 2013 03:44:12 -0800 (PST) From: David Nalley Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2013 06:44:12 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: [DISCUSS] Packaging password/ssh reset scripts To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnQBKKczRMG+9zTyn84ddaexVkIifnAVzqQPbMN+tGb10CL3FJq/v2ziA90FWhpxbfrnSQ6 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi folks: One of the discussions that came up while we were in Ghent was whether or not to package the SSH key reset and password reset utilities, or whether we should focus our PW/SSH efforts on cloud-init. The points for consideration are essentially: * If we begin packaging them, they will be expected to be maintained over the long term - are we as a project ready to do that? * Do we keep the scripts in the repo, or perhaps consider adding a separate repo for the scripts themselves. (This would make it easier for distribution packagers to consume - and even if they don't wish to package all of CloudStack - packaging the scripts themselves would be substantially easier. * cloud-init has CloudStack support IIRC, does it make sense to adopt that rather than doing our own thing, or perhaps to elect one as the primary method. --David