Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-incubator-cloudstack-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cloudstack-dev-archive@minotaur.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0CD86EEF8 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 14:54:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 43950 invoked by uid 500); 20 Feb 2013 14:54:29 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-incubator-cloudstack-dev-archive@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 43884 invoked by uid 500); 20 Feb 2013 14:54:29 -0000 Mailing-List: contact cloudstack-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 43874 invoked by uid 99); 20 Feb 2013 14:54:29 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 14:54:29 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.128.172] (HELO mail-ve0-f172.google.com) (209.85.128.172) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 14:54:24 +0000 Received: by mail-ve0-f172.google.com with SMTP id cz11so6884634veb.31 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 06:54:03 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=pXReCYAV7jXNOtIILIKBy9R8CxC3A8s7nbfsau+BTMw=; b=WNcO4E0DQLQEGux0p2VVgd1I8nSOjk5H6T0BDBKVX4v26SuE8jTVdf6yQWa3pfYPLH KPXHgwtTzHEVG3CCqzXIl76VpRN44GjHm/yRebJR0+qF4Vc7XY8eafFMQVqecmrH1qi7 z0wDJysgODbWHfjOMdO09Fdbfkf8+NwtLuj2isjbpKekPqNXfuL9Y+hK9OhD8qUiRoYo Bn8Hs7RBj3TUlK1uARA7drxAZMg1YsI4lybJcKjeHCuHwfvlOhj/YLCYEAOK5xrS42h8 pJrwBxbHM/bGNseOH7HDSRomEL3F/9iEs9LFeeywOuc/XaFsg4Utn3ETk3Mr4/wdFKob MrIQ== X-Received: by 10.52.38.234 with SMTP id j10mr23451450vdk.0.1361372043538; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 06:54:03 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.140.130 with HTTP; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 06:53:43 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20130219163251.GG7961@USLT-205755.sungardas.corp> References: <20130219163251.GG7961@USLT-205755.sungardas.corp> From: David Nalley Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 09:53:43 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: How we treat broken builds. To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkdtAbrfEL6MHD12jmH+gRhck6MUaI0jZzElbl04+zeYhwJJQMXJa4aoxm9pjequu+kPh6M X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 11:32 AM, Chip Childers wrote: > On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 10:31:44PM -0500, David Nalley wrote: >> On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 9:03 PM, Marcus Sorensen wrote: >> > Are there jenkins reports the committers can subscribe to and get email >> > when there are breakages? I know at least once 4.1 was broken while I was >> > in the process of testing a commit (just a quick sanity check I do to avoid >> > being the guy who causes these sorts of things), and then I committed on >> > top of that broken branch. If there are such emails (and I suspect there >> > are), it would help me to know when to stop working on the branch, and all >> > of the committers should probably sign up. >> > On Feb 17, 2013 6:44 PM, "David Nalley" wrote: >> > >> >> >> Yes there are - the commits mailing list receives the notifications >> from both jenkins.cs.o and builds.a.o. >> Thanks for asking the question, I just assumed everyone knew of, and >> was subscribed to the mailing list. >> >> You can subscribe by sending an email to: >> >> cloudstack-commits-subscribe@incubator.apache.org >> >> --David >> > > I've noticed that although builds.a.o is configured to email the > committers when the build breaks for their changes, it's sending to > weird addresses. For example, I see it sending notices to > chip.childers@apache.org, which doesn't exist. It seems to take the > username from the committer email address, and then use @a.o. Weird. > > Also, perhaps we can configure the jobs to email build failures and "all > better" emails to the dev list instead of commits? I know that > committers should be watching the commits, but I bet that doesn't happen > in real time... and that the dev list would be a better place to get > attention a little more quickly. > That is weird. Probably an artifact of how userids are treated in SVN. Something to bring up with builds@. I am okay with that change - I assume you are going to make it? --David