incubator-cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Sebastien Goasguen <run...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Master is out of licensing compliance (WAS: [jenkins@builds.apache.org: Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-rat-master #753])
Date Fri, 08 Feb 2013 21:45:48 GMT

On Feb 8, 2013, at 10:27 PM, David Nalley <david@gnsa.us> wrote:

> On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 4:24 PM, Sebastien Goasguen <runseb@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> On Feb 8, 2013, at 10:19 PM, David Nalley <david@gnsa.us> wrote:
>> 
>>> On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 4:17 PM, Sebastien Goasguen <runseb@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> On Feb 8, 2013, at 9:58 PM, Chip Childers <chip.childers@sungard.com>
wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 03:52:25PM -0500, David Nalley wrote:
>>>>>> On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 3:48 PM, Chip Childers <chip.childers@sungard.com>
wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Builds are continuing to fail right now...  Due to the check-in
of the
>>>>>>> .po files.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> The offending issues can be seen in the Rat report here:
>>>>>>> https://builds.apache.org/job/cloudstack-rat-master/744/artifact/target/rat.txt
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Do folks think that we should (1) correct them, or (2) exclude
them from
>>>>>>> reporting?  I'm not familiar enough with their lifecycle to know
what
>>>>>>> the right answer is.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> They should be corrected IMO.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> --David
>>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> Sebastien,
>>>>> 
>>>>> As our self appointed "Master of Translation", do you mind doing the
>>>>> honors?
>>>>> 
>>>>> -chip
>>>> 
>>>> The .pot files are generated automatically by publican.
>>>> 
>>>> Sorry I totally missed that they did not have Apache license headers.
>>>> 
>>>> You want me to revert the commit ? never done it.
>>>> 
>>>> -sebastien
>>>> 
>>> 
>>> Why not just add the license header to them?
>>> 
>>> --David
>> 
>> I will do that, but I don't know what it will do with transifex…when we push ...
>> 
>> we will have the same issue with the .po files (there are a few in the runbook branch
right now).
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> It does nothing with transifex - look at the .pot files for the
> runbook - and iirc if you send up pot files with license, po files
> will keep it - but I may be misremembering.
> 
> --David

No you are right, that's how it looks like in the runbook branch (nothing to do there)


Mime
View raw message