incubator-cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us>
Subject Re: [DRAFT] Graduation resolution / IPMC vote email draft for discussion
Date Tue, 26 Feb 2013 05:17:20 GMT
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 5:17 PM, Chip Childers
<chip.childers@sungard.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 12:28:34PM -0600, Joe Brockmeier wrote:
>> On Fri, Feb 22, 2013, at 03:02 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
>> > > What happens if CloudStack starts to do more than manage large networks
of VMs ?
>> > > Pure theoretical speculation on my part.
>> >
>> > Very good point.  We do bare-metal already.
>> >
>> > How about:
>> >
>> > "software to deploy and manage compute, storage and network services, as
>> > a highly available, highly scalable Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS)
>> > cloud computing platform"
>> >
>> > Thoughts?
>>
>> "software to provide Apache CloudStack, a highly available, scalable,
>> Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS) cloud computing platform."
>>
>> or even
>>
>> "to provide Apache CloudStack, open source software that provides a
>> highly available, scalable, Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS) cloud
>> computing platform."
>>
>> Looking at other charters, I don't think we need to get so specific as
>> to discuss compute, network, storage, etc.
>
> How about:
>
> "software to provide and support an Infrastructure-as-a-Service (IaaS)
> cloud computing platform"?
>
> We shouldn't name "Apache CloudStack" as the only product IMO, since we
> may want to publish things like CloudMonkey as a separate package at
> some point.  I also think we need to drop the qualitative measurements,
> given that someone could use it to provide a non-highly available and
> small cloud (if they were to be interested in doing so).

Agreed.

We already have some related projects, and might have more at some
point in the future.

--David

Mime
View raw message