incubator-cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Anthony Xu <Xuefei...@citrix.com>
Subject RE: MEMORY_CONSTRAINT_VIOLATIONMemory limits must satisfy:
Date Thu, 21 Feb 2013 21:27:26 GMT
It should apply to all XerServer and XCP,

Anthony

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.childers@sungard.com]
> Sent: Thursday, February 21, 2013 1:19 PM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Cc: Anthony Xu
> Subject: Re: MEMORY_CONSTRAINT_VIOLATIONMemory limits must satisfy:
> 
> On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 09:41:08PM +0100, Sebastien Goasguen wrote:
> > Anthony,
> >
> > I ran into the CLOUDSTACK-587 bug you created and fixed back in
> december.
> >
> > I am running ubuntu 12.04 with latest xcp-xapi and xen 4.1 kernel.
> >
> > From the bug I can't tell if it was applied to 4.0.1 ? Do you recall ?
> >
> > -Sebastien
> 
> Sebastien / Anthony,
> 
> I cherry-picked this over to the 4.0 branch, and added 4.0.2 to the fix
> version so that it goes out with the next 4.0 bug-fix release.
> 
> -chip
> 
> >
> > On Dec 5, 2012, at 8:57 PM, Anthony Xu <Xuefei.Xu@citrix.com> wrote:
> >
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-587
> > >
> > > I filed the bug and fixed it.
> > >
> > > Anthony
> > >
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: Anthony Xu
> > >> Sent: Wednesday, December 05, 2012 11:29 AM
> > >> To: cloudstack-dev
> > >> Subject: RE: MEMORY_CONSTRAINT_VIOLATIONMemory limits must satisfy:
> > >>
> > >> Hi Charles,
> > >>
> > >> This is a bug, have you filed a bug for this?
> > >>
> > >> Anthony
> > >>
> > >>> -----Original Message-----
> > >>> From: Charles Moulliard [mailto:ch007m@gmail.com]
> > >>> Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2012 8:52 AM
> > >>> To: cloudstack-dev
> > >>> Subject: Fwd: MEMORY_CONSTRAINT_VIOLATIONMemory limits must
> satisfy:
> > >>>
> > >>> Hi,
> > >>>
> > >>> How can I figure out this exception when I try to create a new
> > >> instance
> > >>> using by example Centos 6.3 ISO (compute offering = 500MHertz,
> 500MB,
> > >>> local
> > >>> storage) ?
> > >>>
> > >>> WARN  [xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase] (DirectAgent-36:) Catch
> > >>> Exception:
> > >>> class com.xensource.xenapi.Types$XenAPIException due to
> > >>> MEMORY_CONSTRAINT_VIOLATIONMemory limits must satisfy:
> static_min ?
> > >>> dynamic_min ? dynamic_max ? static_max
> > >>> MEMORY_CONSTRAINT_VIOLATIONMemory limits must satisfy:
> static_min ?
> > >>> dynamic_min ? dynamic_max ? static_max
> > >>> at com.xensource.xenapi.Types.checkResponse(Types.java:1732)
> > >>> at com.xensource.xenapi.Connection.dispatch(Connection.java:368)
> > >>> at
> > >>>
> > >>
> com.cloud.hypervisor.xen.resource.XenServerConnectionPool$XenServerConn
> > >>> ection.dispatch(XenServerConnectionPool.java:909)
> > >>> at com.xensource.xenapi.VM.setMemoryStaticMin(VM.java:3450)
> > >>> at
> > >>>
> > >>
> com.cloud.hypervisor.xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase.setMemory(CitrixRe
> > >>> sourceBase.java:3116)
> > >>> at
> > >>>
> > >>
> com.cloud.hypervisor.xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase.createVmFromTempla
> > >>> te(CitrixResourceBase.java:985)
> > >>> at
> > >>>
> > >>
> com.cloud.hypervisor.xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase.execute(CitrixReso
> > >>> urceBase.java:1278)
> > >>> at
> > >>>
> > >>
> com.cloud.hypervisor.xen.resource.XcpOssResource.execute(XcpOssResource
> > >>> .java:142)
> > >>> at
> > >>>
> > >>
> com.cloud.hypervisor.xen.resource.CitrixResourceBase.executeRequest(Cit
> > >>> rixResourceBase.java:497)
> > >>> at
> > >>>
> > >>
> com.cloud.hypervisor.xen.resource.XcpOssResource.executeRequest(XcpOssR
> > >>> esource.java:136)
> > >>> at
> > >>>
> > >>
> com.cloud.agent.manager.DirectAgentAttache$Task.run(DirectAgentAttache.
> > >>> java:191)
> > >>> at
> > >>>
> > >>
> java.util.concurrent.Executors$RunnableAdapter.call(Executors.java:439)
> > >>> at
> java.util.concurrent.FutureTask$Sync.innerRun(FutureTask.java:303)
> > >>> at java.util.concurrent.FutureTask.run(FutureTask.java:138)
> > >>> at
> > >>>
> > >>
> java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.ac
> > >>> cess$301(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:98)
> > >>> at
> > >>>
> > >>
> java.util.concurrent.ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor$ScheduledFutureTask.ru
> > >>> n(ScheduledThreadPoolExecutor.java:206)
> > >>> at
> > >>>
> > >>
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecut
> > >>> or.java:886)
> > >>> at
> > >>>
> > >>
> java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.j
> > >>> ava:908)
> > >>> at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:680)
> > >>>
> > >>> Regards,
> > >>>
> > >>> --
> > >>> Charles Moulliard
> > >>> Apache Committer / Sr. Enterprise Architect (RedHat)
> > >>> Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> --
> > >>> Charles Moulliard
> > >>> Apache Committer / Sr. Enterprise Architect (RedHat)
> > >>> Twitter : @cmoulliard | Blog : http://cmoulliard.blogspot.com
> >
> >

Mime
View raw message