incubator-cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Animesh Chaturvedi <animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com>
Subject RE: Feature Discuss Emails Tag Update
Date Thu, 14 Feb 2013 22:14:21 GMT


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.childers@sungard.com]
> Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2013 11:20 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Feature Discuss Emails Tag Update
> 
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 11:14:12AM -0800, Min Chen wrote:
> > That may be possible, but we don't need to restrict to only one
> > component in the tag. It is just for quickly filtering emails.
> 
> Sorry, but I think I disagree with this.  I'd rather just have sensible subject lines.
> Too much tagging is going to be impossible to enforce, and frankly seems too
> complicated to figure out what to do as an email author.
> 
[Animesh>] Chip you are not saying no to adding CLOUDSTACK-X tag as I proposed? I agree
too many tags are harder to follow so let's keep it to minimum that allows for efficient filtering
> >
> > Thanks
> > -min
> >
> > On 2/14/13 11:11 AM, "Chip Childers" <chip.childers@sungard.com> wrote:
> >
> > >On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 11:09:00AM -0800, Min Chen wrote:
> > >> I may prefer to have JIRA bug components rather than bug id in the
> > >> subject. With Components, we can easily figure out what area this
> > >> discussion is about.
> > >
> > >But aren't many features going to cross the components?  I.e.: UI,
> > >API and plugin changes?
> > >
> > >>
> > >> Thanks
> > >> -min
> > >>
> > >> On 2/14/13 11:04 AM, "Chip Childers" <chip.childers@sungard.com>
> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> >On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 10:54:34AM -0800, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
> > >> >> Folks
> > >> >>
> > >> >> To make it easier to filter feature discuss emails by mail
> > >> >>clients, Alex suggested that the feature [DISCUSS] emails should
> > >> >>be of the
> > >>format
> > >> >>[DISCUSS][$JIRA-BUG-ID] feature short description
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Example : [DISUSS][CS-527]List API Performance Optimization
> > >> >>
> > >> >> I think this is a good suggestion and will make it simpler and
> > >> >>consistent way for stakeholders to follow their threads. Can we
> > >> >>agree
> > >>to
> > >> >>this? I will update the guidelines in wiki if there is no objection.
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >> Thanks
> > >> >> Animesh
> > >> >
> > >> >+1 with the caveat that it's helpful to use the full CLOUDSTACK-X
> > >> >+bug
> > >> >ID.
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> >

Mime
View raw message