incubator-cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Animesh Chaturvedi <animesh.chaturv...@citrix.com>
Subject RE: [DISCUSS] Should cloudstack-dev mailing list strip "Reply-to" header?
Date Tue, 12 Feb 2013 03:15:10 GMT
It went to a folder that I forgot to check, 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Animesh Chaturvedi
> Sent: Monday, February 11, 2013 7:13 PM
> To: 'Chip Childers'
> Cc: 'Sheng Yang'; Alex Huang; Frank Zhang; cloudstack-
> dev@incubator.apache.org; Alex Karasulu
> Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Should cloudstack-dev mailing list strip "Reply-to"
> header?
> 
> My bad I must have missed it
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.childers@sungard.com]
> > Sent: Monday, February 11, 2013 7:04 PM
> > To: Animesh Chaturvedi
> > Cc: 'Sheng Yang'; Alex Huang; Frank Zhang; cloudstack-
> > dev@incubator.apache.org; Alex Karasulu
> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Should cloudstack-dev mailing list strip "Reply-to"
> > header?
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 06:44:21PM -0800, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
> > > Sheng
> > >
> > > Let's get the VOTE started
> > >
> >
> > We already did [1], and Sheng kindly opened the INFRA ticket to revert
> > the change to the list configuration [2].
> >
> > [1] http://markmail.org/message/nxy6lmifqhnstz3a
> > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-5850
> >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Frank Zhang [mailto:Frank.Zhang@citrix.com]
> > > > Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2013 1:37 PM
> > > > To: 'Sheng Yang'; Alex Huang
> > > > Cc: Chip Childers; cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org; Alex
> > > > Karasulu
> > > > Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Should cloudstack-dev mailing list strip "Reply-to"
> > > > header?
> > > >
> > > > Let's just get the vote start
> > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Sheng Yang [mailto:sheng@yasker.org]
> > > > > Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2013 12:06 PM
> > > > > To: Alex Huang
> > > > > Cc: Chip Childers; cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org; Alex
> > > > > Karasulu
> > > > > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Should cloudstack-dev mailing list strip "Reply-to"
> > > > > header?
> > > > >
> > > > > In fact I just found adding "Reply-to" on behavior of mailing
> > > > > list server violated the IETF's definition of email.
> > > > >
> > > > > Accord to the latest RFC 5322(obsoletes RFC 2822, which
> > > > > obsoletes RFC
> > > > > 822) on "Internet Message Format"[1], 3.6.2 Originator Fields:
> > > > >
> > > > > <quote>
> > > > > When the "Reply-To:" field is present, it
> > > > >    indicates the address(es) to which the author of the message suggests
> > > > >    that replies be sent.
> > > > > </quote>
> > > > >
> > > > > Apparently, mailing list server is NOT the author of message, so
> > > > > it have no privilege to add this field to the mail.
> > > > >
> > > > > Also, it's recommended to read the article by Chip
> > > > > Rosenthal(which provided by Alex in the previous mail)[2], titled
> `"Reply-To"
> > > > > Munging Considered Harmful`.
> > > > >
> > > > > [1] http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5322#section-3.6.2
> > > > > [2] http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html
> > > > >
> > > > > --Sheng

Mime
View raw message