incubator-cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Chip Childers <chip.child...@sungard.com>
Subject Re: Feature Discuss Emails Tag Update
Date Thu, 14 Feb 2013 19:20:13 GMT
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 11:14:12AM -0800, Min Chen wrote:
> That may be possible, but we don't need to restrict to only one component
> in the tag. It is just for quickly filtering emails.

Sorry, but I think I disagree with this.  I'd rather just have sensible
subject lines.  Too much tagging is going to be impossible to enforce,
and frankly seems too complicated to figure out what to do as an email
author.

> 
> Thanks
> -min
> 
> On 2/14/13 11:11 AM, "Chip Childers" <chip.childers@sungard.com> wrote:
> 
> >On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 11:09:00AM -0800, Min Chen wrote:
> >> I may prefer to have JIRA bug components rather than bug id in the
> >> subject. With Components, we can easily figure out what area this
> >> discussion is about.
> >
> >But aren't many features going to cross the components?  I.e.: UI, API
> >and plugin changes?
> >
> >> 
> >> Thanks
> >> -min
> >> 
> >> On 2/14/13 11:04 AM, "Chip Childers" <chip.childers@sungard.com> wrote:
> >> 
> >> >On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 10:54:34AM -0800, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
> >> >> Folks
> >> >> 
> >> >> To make it easier to filter feature discuss emails by mail clients,
> >> >>Alex suggested that the feature [DISCUSS] emails should be of the
> >>format
> >> >>[DISCUSS][$JIRA-BUG-ID] feature short description
> >> >> 
> >> >> Example : [DISUSS][CS-527]List API Performance Optimization
> >> >> 
> >> >> I think this is a good suggestion and will make it simpler and
> >> >>consistent way for stakeholders to follow their threads. Can we agree
> >>to
> >> >>this? I will update the guidelines in wiki if there is no objection.
> >> >> 
> >> >> 
> >> >> Thanks
> >> >> Animesh
> >> >
> >> >+1 with the caveat that it's helpful to use the full CLOUDSTACK-X bug
> >> >ID.
> >> 
> >> 
> 
> 

Mime
View raw message