incubator-cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Sebastien Goasguen <run...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Master is out of licensing compliance (WAS: [jenkins@builds.apache.org: Build failed in Jenkins: cloudstack-rat-master #753])
Date Fri, 08 Feb 2013 21:55:57 GMT

On Feb 8, 2013, at 10:45 PM, Sebastien Goasguen <runseb@gmail.com> wrote:

> 
> On Feb 8, 2013, at 10:27 PM, David Nalley <david@gnsa.us> wrote:
> 
>> On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 4:24 PM, Sebastien Goasguen <runseb@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> On Feb 8, 2013, at 10:19 PM, David Nalley <david@gnsa.us> wrote:
>>> 
>>>> On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 4:17 PM, Sebastien Goasguen <runseb@gmail.com>
wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Feb 8, 2013, at 9:58 PM, Chip Childers <chip.childers@sungard.com>
wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 03:52:25PM -0500, David Nalley wrote:
>>>>>>> On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 3:48 PM, Chip Childers <chip.childers@sungard.com>
wrote:
>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Builds are continuing to fail right now...  Due to the check-in
of the
>>>>>>>> .po files.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> The offending issues can be seen in the Rat report here:
>>>>>>>> https://builds.apache.org/job/cloudstack-rat-master/744/artifact/target/rat.txt
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Do folks think that we should (1) correct them, or (2) exclude
them from
>>>>>>>> reporting?  I'm not familiar enough with their lifecycle
to know what
>>>>>>>> the right answer is.
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> They should be corrected IMO.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> --David
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Sebastien,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> As our self appointed "Master of Translation", do you mind doing
the
>>>>>> honors?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> -chip
>>>>> 
>>>>> The .pot files are generated automatically by publican.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Sorry I totally missed that they did not have Apache license headers.
>>>>> 
>>>>> You want me to revert the commit ? never done it.
>>>>> 
>>>>> -sebastien
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Why not just add the license header to them?
>>>> 
>>>> --David
>>> 
>>> I will do that, but I don't know what it will do with transifex…when we push
...
>>> 
>>> we will have the same issue with the .po files (there are a few in the runbook
branch right now).
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> It does nothing with transifex - look at the .pot files for the
>> runbook - and iirc if you send up pot files with license, po files
>> will keep it - but I may be misremembering.
>> 
>> --David
> 
> No you are right, that's how it looks like in the runbook branch (nothing to do there)
> 


All fixed now on master and 4.1



Mime
View raw message