Mailing-List: contact cloudstack-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of shadowsor@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.220.182 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20130103184247.GA14712@cloud.citrite.net>
References: 
 <CA+96GG5jz8Pv=TW6WJM9OP9ch3nPV44HA3j-okgeFokacxcM3w@mail.gmail.com>
	<20130103184247.GA14712@cloud.citrite.net>
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2013 11:44:23 -0700
Message-ID: 
 <CALFpzo6KbYsf+VR9rt7nxBpp9ONp8KPn=HadQBky7wV-9_=xTg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Project Bylaws
From: Marcus Sorensen <shadowsor@gmail.com>
To: "cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org"
 <cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org>,
	Prasanna Santhanam <tsp@apache.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=bcaec51a80ca6b53db04d266c0bc

--bcaec51a80ca6b53db04d266c0bc
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

+1 (binding)


On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 11:42 AM, Prasanna Santhanam <
prasanna.santhanam@citrix.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 10:29:45AM -0500, Chip Childers wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > We've had some good discussions on the proposed bylaws over the last
> > couple of weeks [1], so I'd like to move this forward to a VOTE now.
> > Of course, if there are still concerns or discussion points that
> > people want to see addressed, we can stop the vote to discuss and edit
> > as necessary.
> >
> > I've made 2 changes from the last draft I sent out.  They are as follows:
> >
> > * Removed from section 3.4.1 (Technical decisions): "The CloudStack
> > community will assume that silence represents consensus on a
> > proposal."
> > * Added to section 2.3.3 (Committers): "...after approval of the PMC."
> >
> > I'd like us to assume that committer votes are binding for the initial
> > establishment of the bylaws.  If the proposed bylaws are adopted, the
> > PMC will have the binding votes for bylaw changes going forward.
> > Until that's established though, committer status seems like the right
> > way to be inclusive about this process. Of course, any community
> > member has the right to share their opinion via non-binding votes (and
> > I'd encourage you to do so).
> >
> > And now, here's what we're voting on:
> >
> > I'd like to propose that the Apache CloudStack Project Bylaws
> > (included at the bottom of this email message) be adopted by the
> > community.
> >
> > Since this is a critical decision for the community, I'll leave this
> > vote thread open for at least a week.
> >
> > [ ] +1  approve
> > [ ] +0  no opinion
> > [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
> >
> > For sanity in tallying the vote, can committers please be sure to
> > indicate "(binding)" with their vote?
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> --
> Prasanna.,
>

--bcaec51a80ca6b53db04d266c0bc--