Mailing-List: contact cloudstack-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <50E59A16.3030201@widodh.nl>
References: 
 <CA+96GG5jz8Pv=TW6WJM9OP9ch3nPV44HA3j-okgeFokacxcM3w@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+96GG6ospd++Lg7jJaYfU71XTL-RHtP1gL0TOP-cTTiXvijMQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<50E59A16.3030201@widodh.nl>
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2013 09:58:41 -0500
Message-ID: 
 <CA+96GG6ifZmdLsWT2SxBknE4gM1T-7D0xh905TdsCf=kqWnOng@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Project Bylaws
From: Chip Childers <chip.childers@sungard.com>
To: "cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org"
 <cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 9:47 AM, Wido den Hollander <wido@widodh.nl> wrote:
> On 01/02/2013 09:52 PM, Chip Childers wrote:
>>
>> One quick follow up.
>>
>> If we approve the bylaw draft, I'll publish it to the website.
>> However, the document comes from the perspective of CloudStack being a
>> top level project (graduated from the incubator).  I'd likely include
>> a header note indicating this issue.  My preference is to approach the
>> process this way, so that we don't have to do an amendment process
>> during / after a potential / eventual graduation.
>>
>
> Not to be picky, but shouldn't this be changed then?
>
>
> "3.1.1. Decisions regarding the project are made by votes on the primary
> project
>
> development mailing list (cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org)."
>
>
> If you are writing like we are graduated should we keep the incubator
> address there? Just to prevent this bylaws being copied and we being haunted
> by this e-mail address still being present in there.
>
> Other then that: +1 (binding)
>
> Wido
>
>> -chip
>>
>
>

Agreed.  I'll make that change in the wiki version.  Unless anyone
objects, I don't think this change represents a reason to restart the
vote.