Mailing-List: contact cloudstack-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CD26EA2D.1BDFB%manan.shah@citrix.com>
References: 
 <CA+2rt42bO_hL-sWSSjbJTrJTKpw0FtnfkbPx68oon1jLcJNe-g@mail.gmail.com>
	<CD26EA2D.1BDFB%manan.shah@citrix.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2013 13:53:36 -0800
Message-ID: 
 <CA+2rt41_YAunF+bBbVEa7E4iZmc--7swd8KAvJ4aKB1UQ8yRDQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] IPv6 support draft functional spec(phase 1)
From: Sheng Yang <sheng@yasker.org>
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 1:40 PM, Manan Shah <manan.shah@citrix.com> wrote:
> Can you please update the FS that you will focus on KVM & Xen for CS 4.1
> release?

Updated.

--Sheng
>
> Regards,
> Manan Shah
>
>
>
>
> On 1/23/13 5:38 PM, "Sheng Yang" <sheng@yasker.org> wrote:
>
>>On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 5:15 PM, Manan Shah <manan.shah@citrix.com> wrote=
:
>>> Sheng, the FS does not talk about any Hypervisor limitations. Is it
>>> assumed that this feature would be supported on all hypervisors?
>>
>>Yes. We would focus on KVM and Xen first.
>>
>>--Sheng
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Manan Shah
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 1/22/13 12:58 PM, "Sheng Yang" <sheng@yasker.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 5:56 AM, Chip Childers
>>>><chip.childers@sungard.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 7:15 AM, Wido den Hollander <wido@widodh.nl>
>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 01/21/2013 07:21 PM, Chiradeep Vittal wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> DHCPv6 does not support/allow you to send default gateway.  This is
>>>>>>>=B3by
>>>>>>> design=B2.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes, you are right! I completely forgot that.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So Router Advertisements are the only way to go in this case indeed.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I don't get the same "rushed" feeling as you do.
>>>>>>> There's > 200 RFCs for IPv6. It is a large and complicated topic an=
d
>>>>>>>not
>>>>>>> many people have experience with it (see above). I feel that it is
>>>>>>>best to
>>>>>>> approach it incrementally and learn our lessons along the way.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We just have to make sure that the *experimental* label stays on it
>>>>>>and warn
>>>>>> that stuff can change.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Wido
>>>>>
>>>>> +1 to incremental development, and +1*10 for labeling it
>>>>> "experimental" for at least the first couple of releases!
>>>>
>>>>+1..
>>>>
>>>>--Sheng
>>>
>