Mailing-List: contact cloudstack-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of Alex.Huang@citrix.com
 designates 66.165.176.89 as permitted sender)
From: Alex Huang <Alex.Huang@citrix.com>
To: "cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org"
	<cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org>
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2013 06:18:08 -0800
Subject: RE: [Discuss] Integration test 
Thread-Topic: [Discuss] Integration test 
Thread-Index: Ac3tI6eaDLl2wJRfTOu/b0tW59IetwAB5DMQAAAwi4AAAGlNcAAV/z4AAAlLqxA=
Message-ID: 
 <B1DF26ECC0458748AC97CECE2DA98D41012FA385ED3C@SJCPMAILBOX01.citrite.net>
References: 
 <C66C814C1ABFA8449FF65CB44953A8B4012CBF3A5740@SJCPMAILBOX01.citrite.net>
 <CD120C2D.279D%howie_yu@trend.com.tw>
In-Reply-To: <CD120C2D.279D%howie_yu@trend.com.tw>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-2022-jp"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0

> On 13/1/8 =1B$B>e8a=1B(B7:33, "Edison Su" <Edison.su@citrix.com> wrote:
>=20
> >BTW, the current junit test case can be transformed into testNG test cas=
e
> >in eclipse automatically. So if we decide to switch to testNG for both
> >unit test and integration test, it's doable with minimal effort. But, I
> >do like junit, which is just so simple to use, and the integration with
> >Spring is much better than testNG. Anyway, better to just use one test
> >framework for all if possible.

I think it's fine to use more than one framework.  I don't see why we shoul=
d limit how people do their now unit tests for example.

However, I do believe that integration testing is something that community =
provides for community so integration testing itself should go on a single =
framework.

--Alex