Mailing-List: contact cloudstack-dev-help@incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
 boundary="===============8485756867768919618=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: Review Request: Fix for CLOUDSTACK-1050 (No section for Adding
 Load
 Balancer Rule)
From: "David Nalley" <david@gnsa.us>
To: "Chip Childers" <chip.childers@sungard.com>,
 "Joe Brockmeier" <jzb@zonker.net>,
 "Jessica Tomechak" <jessica.tomechak@gmail.com>
Cc: "cloudstack" <cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org>,
 "David Nalley" <david@gnsa.us>, "Radhika PC" <radhika.puthiyetath@citrix.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2013 15:19:43 -0000
Message-ID: <20130128151943.24984.12378@reviews.apache.org>
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Sender: "David Nalley" <noreply@reviews.apache.org>
References: <20130124111650.9780.95327@reviews.apache.org>
In-Reply-To: <20130124111650.9780.95327@reviews.apache.org>
Reply-To: "David Nalley" <david@gnsa.us>

--===============8485756867768919618==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/9097/#review15748
-----------------------------------------------------------


This does not apply for me. =


[ke4qqq@mba docs]$ git am foo.patch
Applying: fix for CLOUDSTACK-1048
error: patch failed: docs/en-US/sticky-session-policies-for-lb-rules.xml:3
error: docs/en-US/sticky-session-policies-for-lb-rules.xml: patch does not =
apply
Patch failed at 0001 fix for CLOUDSTACK-1048
The copy of the patch that failed is found in:
   /home/ke4qqq/Documents/apache/cloudstack/incubator-cloudstack/.git/rebas=
e-apply/patch
When you have resolved this problem run "git am --resolved".
If you would prefer to skip this patch, instead run "git am --skip".
To restore the original branch and stop patching run "git am --abort".


Almost as if it were generated off of a different copy of the files in ques=
tion since this is a simple two file patch. =

You are basing your work in master, right? =

This review is only three days old, and afaict, no one has touched the two =
files in question in the past week. =


--David

- David Nalley


On Jan. 24, 2013, 11:16 a.m., Radhika PC wrote:
> =

> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/9097/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> =

> (Updated Jan. 24, 2013, 11:16 a.m.)
> =

> =

> Review request for cloudstack, Chip Childers, Jessica Tomechak, and Joe B=
rockmeier.
> =

> =

> Description
> -------
> =

> Documentation on Adding a Load Balancer Rule and Sticky Session Policies =
for Load Balancer Rules
> =

> =

> This addresses bug CLOUDSTACK-1050.
> =

> =

> Diffs
> -----
> =

>   docs/en-US/load-balancer-rules.xml 8dd7d3b =

>   docs/en-US/sticky-session-policies-for-lb-rules.xml a8acfa0 =

> =

> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/9097/diff/
> =

> =

> Testing
> -------
> =

> Patch applies,
> =

> =

> Thanks,
> =

> Radhika PC
> =

>


--===============8485756867768919618==--