incubator-cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Abhinandan Prateek <Abhinandan.Prat...@citrix.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Accept a donation of "Documentation for various features" from Citrix
Date Sat, 19 Jan 2013 04:03:56 GMT
+1 (binding)

On 19/01/13 8:43 AM, "Prasanna Santhanam" <tsp@apache.org> wrote:

>+1 (binding)
>
>On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 11:18:30PM +0530, Animesh Chaturvedi wrote:
>> Reposting with subject line VOTE.
>> 
>> Committers have binding votes for this decision.
>> 
>> Please respond with your vote:
>> +1 - Accept the donation and begin the process of bringing this
>> +enhancement to CloudStack
>> in via the IP clearance process
>> +0 - Don't care
>> -1 - Do not accept the donation
>> 
>> This vote will remain open for ~72 hours.
>> 
>> Content Location: http://people.apache.org/~jtomechak
>> 
>> 	
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: Jessica Tomechak [mailto:Jessica.Tomechak@citrix.com]
>> > Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2013 7:05 PM
>> > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> > Subject: RE: [IP Clearance] Potential issues
>> > 
>> > On people.apache.org/~jtomechak, I have posted all my docs related to
>>the bug
>> > items in the IP Clearance list which Animesh provided.
>> > 
>> > I have made notations in the Doc sub-task of each bug, so that anyone
>> > reviewing the proposed feature can easily find the documentation.
>> > 
>> > In addition, I made a note for myself of the doc status of each bug
>>in that list,
>> > and here it is for anyone who is interested!
>> > 
>> > CLOUDSTACK-774 :
>> > Code in ACS repo: No
>> > Functional Spec Posted: Yes
>> > Community Discussion Done: Yes
>> > Contribution Size Approx: 5000 lines
>> > Contributor : Frank
>> > IP Clearance needed initial recommendation: Yes
>> > Docs: None exist. This was not announced or supported as a Citrix CP
>>3.0.6
>> > feature.
>> > 
>> > 
>> > CLOUDSTACK-306 :
>> > Code in ACS repo: Yes
>> > Functional Spec Posted: Yes
>> > Community Discussion Done: Yes in October Contribution Size Approx:
>>1500
>> > lines Contributor : Sheng IP Clearance needed initial recommendation:
>>Yes
>> > Docs: Already submitted via reviewboard. Link and info in doc subtask.
>> > 
>> > 
>> > CLOUDSTACK-777/700 :
>> > Code in ACS repo: Yes
>> > Functional Spec Posted: No
>> > Community Discussion Done: Yes
>> > Contribution Size Approx: 500 lines
>> > Contributor : Kishan/Jayapal/Rajesh/Murali IP Clearance needed initial
>> > recommendation: Yes
>> > Docs: Pending on reviewboard. URL and notations in the doc subtask of
>>the bug.
>> > 
>> > CLOUDSTACK-778/319 :
>> > Code in ACS repo: No
>> > Functional Spec Posted: No
>> > Community Discussion Done: Yes
>> > Contribution Size Approx: should be small Contributor : Vijayendra IP
>>Clearance
>> > needed initial recommendation: This is a trivial issue so may be no
>> > Docs: Pending on reviewboard. Info is in the doc subtask of the bug.
>> > 
>> > CLOUDSTACK-299 :
>> > Code in ACS repo: UI code is there but backend is not Functional Spec
>>Posted:
>> > Yes Community Discussion Done: Yes Contribution Size Approx: 1400
>>lines
>> > Contributor : Jayapal IP Clearance needed initial recommendation: Yes
>> > Docs: Pending on reviewboard. Link is provided in the description of
>>the bug.
>> > 
>> > CLOUDSTACK-297 :
>> > Code in ACS repo: No, but posted on review board Functional Spec
>>Posted: Yes
>> > Community Discussion Done: Yes Contribution Size Approx: 350 lines
>> > Contributor : Hari IP Clearance needed initial recommendation:
>> > Docs: One paragraph of new docs on people.a.o. The URL is noted in
>>the doc
>> > subtask of the bug.
>>http://people.apache.org/~jtomechak/CLOUDSTACK-297/
>> > 
>> > 
>> > CLOUDSTACK-197 :
>> > Code in ACS repo: Multiple patches posted on review board Functional
>>Spec
>> > Posted: Yes Community Discussion Done: Yes Contribution Size Approx:
>>3000
>> > lines Contributor : Likitha IP Clearance needed initial
>>recommendation: No,
>> > since incremental patches were posted over a period
>> > Docs: Believe docs already exist, authored on the community side by
>>Sebastien
>> > G.
>> > 
>> > CLOUDSTACK-192 :
>> > Code in ACS repo: No
>> > Functional Spec Posted: Yes
>> > Community Discussion Done: Yes, but no consensus reached Contribution
>>Size
>> > Approx: 1000 lines Contributor : Sanjay IP Clearance needed initial
>> > recommendation: Yes, if community agrees to feature inclusion
>> > Docs: On people.a.o. The URL is noted in the doc subtask of the bug.
>> > http://people.apache.org/~jtomechak/CLOUDSTACK-192/
>> > 
>> > 
>> > CLOUDSTACK-304 / 784 :
>> > Code in ACS repo: Yes
>> > Functional Spec Posted: Yes
>> > Community Discussion Done: Yes
>> > Contribution Size Approx: 600
>> > Contributor : Alena
>> > IP Clearance needed initial recommendation: No, since commits were
>>done
>> > way back in October over a period of 1 week
>> > Docs: On people.a.o. The URL is noted in the doc subtask of the bug.
>> > http://people.apache.org/~jtomechak/CLOUDSTACK-737/
>> > 
>> > CLOUDSTACK-265 :
>> > Code in ACS repo: Yes
>> > Functional Spec Posted: Yes
>> > Community Discussion Done: Yes
>> > Contribution Size Approx: 450
>> > Contributor : Murali
>> > IP Clearance needed initial recommendation: Yes
>> > Docs: Pending on reviewboard. URL is noted in the doc subtask of the
>>bug.
>> > 
>> > CLOUDSTACK-737 :
>> > Code in ACS repo: No
>> > Functional Spec Posted: Yes
>> > Community Discussion Done: Yes
>> > Contribution Size Approx: 2000
>> > Contributor : Anthony
>> > IP Clearance needed initial recommendation: Yes
>> > Docs: On people.a.o. The URL is noted in the doc subtask of the bug.
>> > http://people.apache.org/~jtomechak/CLOUDSTACK-737/
>> > 
>> > 
>> > CLOUDSTACK-177 :
>> > Code in ACS repo: Yes
>> > Functional Spec Posted: Yes
>> > Community Discussion Done: Yes
>> > Contribution Size Approx: 300
>> > Contributor : Brian
>> > IP Clearance needed initial recommendation: No, multiple commits over
>> > several days
>> > Docs: None were written, probably none needed
>> > 
>> > CLOUDSTACK-662 :
>> > Code in ACS repo: Yes
>> > Functional Spec Posted: Yes
>> > Community Discussion Done: Yes
>> > Contribution Size Approx: 500
>> > Contributor : Brian
>> > IP Clearance needed initial recommendation: No, multiple commits over
>> > several days
>> > Docs: None were written, probably none needed
>> > 
>> > CLOUDSTACK-176 :
>> > Code in ACS repo: Yes
>> > Functional Spec Posted: Yes
>> > Community Discussion Done: Yes
>> > Contribution Size Approx: 200
>> > Contributor : Pranav
>> > IP Clearance needed initial recommendation: No, multiple commits over
>> > several days
>> > Docs: None needed
>> > 
>> > 
>> > CLOUDSTACK-312 :
>> > Code in ACS repo: Yes
>> > Functional Spec Posted: Yes
>> > Community Discussion Done: Yes
>> > Contribution Size Approx:
>> > Contributor : Murali
>> > IP Clearance needed initial recommendation: Potentially yes, multiple
>>commits
>> > in one day
>> > Docs: Pending on reviewboard. The URL is noted in the Doc subtask of
>>the bug.
>> > 
>> > 
>> > CLOUDSTACK-873 :
>> > Code in ACS repo: No
>> > Functional Spec Posted: No
>> > Community Discussion Done: No
>> > Contribution Size Approx: Work not started Contributor : Vijayendra/
>>Kelven IP
>> > Clearance needed initial recommendation: No as work has not started
>>on it yet.
>> > Preliminary investigation done, running into issues with vmware.
>> > Docs: No existing docs.
>> > 
>> > 
>> > Jessica Tomechak
>> > 
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: Animesh Chaturvedi [mailto:animesh.chaturvedi@citrix.com]
>> > Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2013 12:25 PM
>> > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> > Subject: RE: [IP Clearance] Potential issues
>> > 
>> > I am waiting for code to be posted to start the IP clearance process
>>for the ones
>> > identified in my email. Let me send reminders.
>> > 
>> > > -----Original Message-----
>> > > From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.childers@sungard.com]
>> > > Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2013 12:19 PM
>> > > To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> > > Subject: Re: [IP Clearance] Potential issues
>> > >
>> > > On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 6:53 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi
>> > > <animesh.chaturvedi@citrix.com> wrote:
>> > > > To keep the community posted on status on IP clearance. I have
>> > > > followed up
>> > > with the contributors of the issues mentioned, as soon as the code
>>is
>> > > posted publicly, we will start the IP clearance review process.
>> > > >
>> > > > Thanks
>> > > > Animesh
>> > >
>> > > Animesh (others) - are there any challenges that you need help with
>>in
>> > > getting this done?
>
>-- 
>Prasanna.,


Mime
View raw message