incubator-cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Chiradeep Vittal <Chiradeep.Vit...@citrix.com>
Subject Re: [ASF4.1] [Discuss] health monitoring for load balanced instances
Date Thu, 17 Jan 2013 07:20:41 GMT
The new FS does not make mention of HAProxy?

On 1/16/13 8:57 PM, "Rajesh Battala" <rajesh.battala@citrix.com> wrote:

>Hi Chiradeep, 
>
>Here is the FS link for AWS Style health checks
>https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/AWS+Style+Health+Ch
>ecks 
>I have added NetScaler Nito API classes to the FS.
>API's starting with "Configure" as used to create devices like
>(configureF5LoadBalancer, configureNetscalerLoadBalancer , etc)
>I had modified the API Command  from configureLBHealthCheck to
>createLbHealthCheck.
>
>Sorry I didn't get your question in the below thread.
>
>Thanks
>Rajesh Battala
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:Chiradeep.Vittal@citrix.com]
>Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 1:40 AM
>To: CloudStack DeveloperList
>Subject: Re: [ASF4.1] [Discuss] health monitoring for load balanced
>instances
>
>Has this been updated?
>Note that FS's are being posted under
>https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/
>And that one already is here:
>https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Load+Balancer+Healt
>h
>+checks
>
>On 1/7/13 11:30 PM, "Rajesh Battala" <rajesh.battala@citrix.com> wrote:
>
>>Hi Chiradeep,
>>
>>I would be supporting NetScaler and HAProxy.
>>First I would be working on NetScaler and then haproxy.
>>I don't have permission to create branch in asf, I would be cloning asf
>>master in git hub and will work on it by regularly rebasing the repo
>>with master.
>>
>>I will update NS API's in the FS.
>>
>>Thanks
>>Rajesh Battala
>>
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:Chiradeep.Vittal@citrix.com]
>>Sent: Tuesday, January 8, 2013 12:32 PM
>>To: CloudStack DeveloperList
>>Subject: Re: [ASF4.1] [Discuss] health monitoring for load balanced
>>instances
>>
>>Thanks Rajesh.
>>Is the feature going to be supported only with NetScaler devices?
>>There's a few places where it says Virtual Router.
>>
>>Features should be developed on feature branches.	
>>Can you document the exact API?
>>IIRC, there is no other CS API that begins with "configure"
>>
>>
>>On 1/7/13 10:53 PM, "Rajesh Battala" <rajesh.battala@citrix.com> wrote:
>>
>>>FS is created for this feature at
>>>https://cwiki.apache.org/CLOUDSTACK/aws-style-health-checks.html
>>>This is initially discussed in the ticket
>>>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-443
>>>
>>>Thanks
>>>Rajesh Battala
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: Manan Shah [mailto:manan.shah@citrix.com]
>>>Sent: Saturday, December 22, 2012 4:37 AM
>>>To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>>Subject: Re: [ASF4.1] [Discuss] health monitoring for load balanced
>>>instances
>>>
>>>I have added a requirements page under 4.1 for this requirement.
>>>
>>>https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Load+Balancer+H
>>>e
>>>alt
>>>h
>>>+checks
>>>
>>>Regards,
>>>Manan Shah
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>On 12/18/12 7:59 PM, "Rajesh Battala" <rajesh.battala@citrix.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>From: Rajesh Battala [mailto:rajesh.battala@citrix.com]
>>>>Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2012 9:21 AM
>>>>To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>>>Subject: RE: [ASF4.1] [Discuss] health monitoring for load balanced
>>>>instances
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>From: Alex Huang [mailto:Alex.Huang@citrix.com]
>>>>Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2012 4:38 AM
>>>>To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>>>Subject: RE: [ASF4.1] [Discuss] health monitoring for load balanced
>>>>instances
>>>>
>>>>> One question that I have though, which may be off topic to the
>>>>> specific proposal.  I understand that you are proposing Netscaler
>>>>> and HAProxy support (and you are absolutely within your right to
>>>>> only volunteer for those two), but I'd also love to see the F5
>>>>> support be upgraded to support this feature as well.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Does anyone remember if F5 lent engineering support when F5 support
>>>>> was added to CS?  Or was it all Cloud.com / Citrix folks that did it?
>>>>> Ideally, this is a great place to see if we can get someone that's
>>>>> interested in continuing to support the F5 LBs involved in
>>>>> development (not necessarily someone sponsored by F5, but that's
>>>>> not necessarily a negative if they were).  Does anyone want to take
>>>>> this on and work with Rajesh?
>>>>> 
>>>>
>>>>F5 was entirely written by Cloud.com.
>>>>
>>>>On features that can affect multiple hardware resources, we should
>>>>create a subtask for each hardware resource to support that feature.
>>>>
>>>>--Alex
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>We can have an umbrella ticket and create a sub ticket/task for each
>>>>Hardware resource. I will create those tickets.
>>>>
>>>>Thanks
>>>>Rajesh Battala
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Done creating the sub-tasks for each hardware resources.
>>>>Here are the tickets.
>>>>
>>>>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-663 health
>>>>monitoring for F5 load balanced instances
>>>>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-664 Health
>>>>monitoring for NetScaler load balanced instances
>>>>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-665 Health
>>>>monitoring for HAProxy load balanced instances
>>>>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-666 Health
>>>>monitoring for Brocade load balanced instances
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Thanks
>>>>Rajesh Battala
>>>
>>
>


Mime
View raw message