incubator-cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Chiradeep Vittal <Chiradeep.Vit...@citrix.com>
Subject Re: [ACS41] Concerns about where development has happened
Date Fri, 11 Jan 2013 23:08:35 GMT
This might help:
http://git-scm.com/2010/03/08/rerere.html


On 1/11/13 1:16 PM, "Alex Huang" <Alex.Huang@citrix.com> wrote:

>The problem with these reverts is that I've already pulled them into
>javelin when we started the merge.  I'm not sure what to do now because
>they are quite large and complicated to unwind.
>
>Any suggestions?
>
>--Alex
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Chip Childers [mailto:chip.childers@sungard.com]
>> Sent: Friday, January 11, 2013 12:10 PM
>> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: [ACS41] Concerns about where development has happened
>> 
>> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 2:40 PM, David Nalley <david@gnsa.us> wrote:
>> > On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 2:22 PM, Chip Childers
>> > <chip.childers@sungard.com> wrote:
>> >> IMO, no.  I want the first issue resolved first (revert the code that
>> >> shouldn't be in the repo).  Then we can talk about accepting the
>> >> donation proposal I assume is coming.
>> >>
>> >> But this is just my opinion.  Anyone else?
>> >>
>> >> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 2:19 PM, Animesh Chaturvedi
>> >> <animesh.chaturvedi@citrix.com> wrote:
>> >>> Chip
>> >>>
>> >>> Should we expedite IP clearance process and avoid having to revert
>> commits?
>> >>>
>> >>> Thanks
>> >>> Animesh
>> >>>
>> >
>> >
>> > I don't know that there is a 'expedite' option. Our history thus far
>> > is that this doesn't happen rapidly. I think the fastest we can get
>> > away with is likely a week - and that's assuming all of the planets
>> > align, all paperwork is immediately signed, acknowledged, we have only
>> > tailwinds, etc. Given that it is currently the 11th, I'm not even sure
>> > that with the volume of problematic features that they'll even be
>> > through IP Clearance by code freeze.
>> >
>> > --David
>> >
>> 
>> These reverts are now blocking Chiradeep's refactoring effort / merge
>> proposal.  I'd suggest that not only should the reverts happen first,
>> but that they happen soon please.


Mime
View raw message