incubator-cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Chip Childers <chip.child...@sungard.com>
Subject Re: [ACS41] Are we proposing to drop VPN support on SRX?
Date Tue, 08 Jan 2013 21:49:51 GMT
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 6:55 PM, Sheng Yang <sheng@yasker.org> wrote:
> Yes, as I explained in CLOUDSTACK-307, the VPN support on SRX is too poor
> with multiple tenants, and have too many limitation, so we want to drop the
> support for remote access VPN on SRX, and looking forward for Cisco
> ASA1000v support instead(which is a big new work).
>

Thanks for explaining.  I've moved the design document to the
uncommitted designs page.

> On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 12:55 PM, Chip Childers <chip.childers@sungard.com>wrote:
>
>> Sheng,
>>
>> When reviewing CLOUDSTACK-307, I noticed that the functional spec page
>> [1] has a big statement at the top: "(This draft is obsolete, due to
>> we drop the support for Remote Access VPN on SRX)".
>>
>> What does that mean?
>>
>> -chip
>>
>>
>> [1]
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Remote+Access+VPN+support+on+SRX
>>

Mime
View raw message