incubator-cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Anthony Xu <Xuefei...@citrix.com>
Subject RE: [DISCUSS] IPv6 support draft functional spec(phase 1)
Date Fri, 18 Jan 2013 19:48:23 GMT
Dual stack in user VM or router VM?
router VM must have dual stack because link-local is still ipv4, right?


Anthony

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sheng Yang [mailto:sheng@yasker.org]
> Sent: Friday, January 18, 2013 11:13 AM
> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] IPv6 support draft functional spec(phase 1)
> 
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 7:05 PM, Chiradeep Vittal
> <Chiradeep.Vittal@citrix.com> wrote:
> > The spec calls for dualstack, so ipv4 would still work?
> 
> I think it would be stage 2 of phase 1, after ipv6 stack only.
> 
> --Sheng
> >
> > On 1/17/13 3:49 PM, "Sheng Yang" <sheng@yasker.org> wrote:
> >
> >>On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Alex Huang <Alex.Huang@citrix.com>
> wrote:
> >>>> We just want to make thing as simple as possible for the phase 1.
> The
> >>>> service other than DNS/DHCP would be supported later, and depends
> on
> >>>> how much time we have.
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> How do you present something like this to the end user if it works
> one
> >>>way and not another.  It needs to be consistent.
> >>>
> >>Let's get the DNS/DHCP part done first...
> >>
> >>--Sheng
> >

Mime
View raw message