incubator-cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rajesh Battala <rajesh.batt...@citrix.com>
Subject RE: [ASF4.1] [Discuss] health monitoring for load balanced instances
Date Thu, 17 Jan 2013 04:57:53 GMT
Hi Chiradeep, 

Here is the FS link for AWS Style health checks https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/AWS+Style+Health+Checks

I have added NetScaler Nito API classes to the FS. 
API's starting with "Configure" as used to create devices like (configureF5LoadBalancer, configureNetscalerLoadBalancer
, etc)
I had modified the API Command  from configureLBHealthCheck to createLbHealthCheck.

Sorry I didn't get your question in the below thread. 

Thanks
Rajesh Battala


-----Original Message-----
From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:Chiradeep.Vittal@citrix.com] 
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 1:40 AM
To: CloudStack DeveloperList
Subject: Re: [ASF4.1] [Discuss] health monitoring for load balanced instances

Has this been updated?
Note that FS's are being posted under
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/
And that one already is here:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Load+Balancer+Health
+checks

On 1/7/13 11:30 PM, "Rajesh Battala" <rajesh.battala@citrix.com> wrote:

>Hi Chiradeep,
>
>I would be supporting NetScaler and HAProxy.
>First I would be working on NetScaler and then haproxy.
>I don't have permission to create branch in asf, I would be cloning asf 
>master in git hub and will work on it by regularly rebasing the repo 
>with master.
>
>I will update NS API's in the FS.
>
>Thanks
>Rajesh Battala
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:Chiradeep.Vittal@citrix.com]
>Sent: Tuesday, January 8, 2013 12:32 PM
>To: CloudStack DeveloperList
>Subject: Re: [ASF4.1] [Discuss] health monitoring for load balanced 
>instances
>
>Thanks Rajesh.
>Is the feature going to be supported only with NetScaler devices?
>There's a few places where it says Virtual Router.
>
>Features should be developed on feature branches.	
>Can you document the exact API?
>IIRC, there is no other CS API that begins with "configure"
>
>
>On 1/7/13 10:53 PM, "Rajesh Battala" <rajesh.battala@citrix.com> wrote:
>
>>FS is created for this feature at
>>https://cwiki.apache.org/CLOUDSTACK/aws-style-health-checks.html
>>This is initially discussed in the ticket
>>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-443
>>
>>Thanks
>>Rajesh Battala
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Manan Shah [mailto:manan.shah@citrix.com]
>>Sent: Saturday, December 22, 2012 4:37 AM
>>To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>Subject: Re: [ASF4.1] [Discuss] health monitoring for load balanced 
>>instances
>>
>>I have added a requirements page under 4.1 for this requirement.
>>
>>https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Load+Balancer+H
>>e
>>alt
>>h
>>+checks
>>
>>Regards,
>>Manan Shah
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>On 12/18/12 7:59 PM, "Rajesh Battala" <rajesh.battala@citrix.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: Rajesh Battala [mailto:rajesh.battala@citrix.com]
>>>Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2012 9:21 AM
>>>To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>>Subject: RE: [ASF4.1] [Discuss] health monitoring for load balanced 
>>>instances
>>>
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: Alex Huang [mailto:Alex.Huang@citrix.com]
>>>Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2012 4:38 AM
>>>To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>>Subject: RE: [ASF4.1] [Discuss] health monitoring for load balanced 
>>>instances
>>>
>>>> One question that I have though, which may be off topic to the 
>>>> specific proposal.  I understand that you are proposing Netscaler 
>>>> and HAProxy support (and you are absolutely within your right to 
>>>> only volunteer for those two), but I'd also love to see the F5 
>>>> support be upgraded to support this feature as well.
>>>> 
>>>> Does anyone remember if F5 lent engineering support when F5 support 
>>>> was added to CS?  Or was it all Cloud.com / Citrix folks that did it?
>>>> Ideally, this is a great place to see if we can get someone that's 
>>>> interested in continuing to support the F5 LBs involved in 
>>>> development (not necessarily someone sponsored by F5, but that's 
>>>> not necessarily a negative if they were).  Does anyone want to take 
>>>> this on and work with Rajesh?
>>>> 
>>>
>>>F5 was entirely written by Cloud.com.
>>>
>>>On features that can affect multiple hardware resources, we should 
>>>create a subtask for each hardware resource to support that feature.
>>>
>>>--Alex
>>>
>>>
>>>We can have an umbrella ticket and create a sub ticket/task for each 
>>>Hardware resource. I will create those tickets.
>>>
>>>Thanks
>>>Rajesh Battala
>>>
>>>
>>>Done creating the sub-tasks for each hardware resources.
>>>Here are the tickets.
>>>
>>>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-663 health 
>>>monitoring for F5 load balanced instances
>>>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-664 Health 
>>>monitoring for NetScaler load balanced instances
>>>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-665 Health 
>>>monitoring for HAProxy load balanced instances
>>>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-666 Health 
>>>monitoring for Brocade load balanced instances
>>>
>>>
>>>Thanks
>>>Rajesh Battala
>>
>


Mime
View raw message