incubator-cloudstack-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rajesh Battala <rajesh.batt...@citrix.com>
Subject RE: [ASF4.1] [Discuss] health monitoring for load balanced instances
Date Tue, 08 Jan 2013 06:53:53 GMT
FS is created for this feature at https://cwiki.apache.org/CLOUDSTACK/aws-style-health-checks.html

This is initially discussed in the ticket https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-443


Thanks
Rajesh Battala

-----Original Message-----
From: Manan Shah [mailto:manan.shah@citrix.com] 
Sent: Saturday, December 22, 2012 4:37 AM
To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [ASF4.1] [Discuss] health monitoring for load balanced instances

I have added a requirements page under 4.1 for this requirement.

https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Load+Balancer+Health
+checks

Regards,
Manan Shah




On 12/18/12 7:59 PM, "Rajesh Battala" <rajesh.battala@citrix.com> wrote:

>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Rajesh Battala [mailto:rajesh.battala@citrix.com]
>Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2012 9:21 AM
>To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
>Subject: RE: [ASF4.1] [Discuss] health monitoring for load balanced 
>instances
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Alex Huang [mailto:Alex.Huang@citrix.com]
>Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2012 4:38 AM
>To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
>Subject: RE: [ASF4.1] [Discuss] health monitoring for load balanced 
>instances
>
>> One question that I have though, which may be off topic to the 
>> specific proposal.  I understand that you are proposing Netscaler and 
>> HAProxy support (and you are absolutely within your right to only 
>> volunteer for those two), but I'd also love to see the F5 support be 
>> upgraded to support this feature as well.
>> 
>> Does anyone remember if F5 lent engineering support when F5 support 
>> was added to CS?  Or was it all Cloud.com / Citrix folks that did it?
>> Ideally, this is a great place to see if we can get someone that's 
>> interested in continuing to support the F5 LBs involved in 
>> development (not necessarily someone sponsored by F5, but that's not 
>> necessarily a negative if they were).  Does anyone want to take this 
>> on and work with Rajesh?
>> 
>
>F5 was entirely written by Cloud.com.
>
>On features that can affect multiple hardware resources, we should 
>create a subtask for each hardware resource to support that feature.
>
>--Alex
>
>
>We can have an umbrella ticket and create a sub ticket/task for each 
>Hardware resource. I will create those tickets.
>
>Thanks
>Rajesh Battala
>
>
>Done creating the sub-tasks for each hardware resources.
>Here are the tickets.
>
>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-663 health monitoring 
>for F5 load balanced instances
>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-664 Health monitoring 
>for NetScaler load balanced instances
>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-665 Health monitoring 
>for HAProxy load balanced instances
>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-666 Health monitoring 
>for Brocade load balanced instances
>
>
>Thanks
>Rajesh Battala


Mime
View raw message